Advertisement
CIADF vs FPAFF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIADF is a Hold and FPAFF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CIADF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFPAFF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CIADF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- FPAFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CIADF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FPAFF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CIADF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
- FPAFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CIADF (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FPAFF (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was -2.83% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.48%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Major Diversified (-0.46% weekly)Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.
| CIADF | FPAFF | CIADF / FPAFF | |
| Capitalization | 7.35B | 3.42B | 215% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 2.86B | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.676 | 38.956 | 66% |
| P/E Ratio | 515.87 | 4.68 | 11,026% |
| Revenue | N/A | 10.5B | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 2.35B | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 11.7B | - |
CIADF | FPAFF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 3 | 31 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 39 Fair valued | 15 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 16 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 55 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | 66 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 42 | 45 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FPAFF's Valuation (15) in the null industry is in the same range as CIADF (39). This means that FPAFF’s stock grew similarly to CIADF’s over the last 12 months.
FPAFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CIADF (100). This means that FPAFF’s stock grew significantly faster than CIADF’s over the last 12 months.
CIADF's SMR Rating (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FPAFF (96). This means that CIADF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FPAFF’s over the last 12 months.
FPAFF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as CIADF (63). This means that FPAFF’s stock grew similarly to CIADF’s over the last 12 months.
CIADF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FPAFF (66). This means that CIADF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FPAFF’s over the last 12 months.
| CIADF | FPAFF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 29% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 29% | 2 days ago 56% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 25% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 34% | 2 days ago 50% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 33% | 2 days ago 47% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 29 days ago 25% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 45% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 16% | 2 days ago 48% |
Advertisement
CIADF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CIADF and SHVTF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CIADF and SHVTF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIADF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIADF | 100% | N/A | ||
| SHVTF - CIADF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CFEIY - CIADF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FPAFF - CIADF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DANOY - CIADF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CIADY - CIADF | 0% Poorly correlated | -1.82% | ||
More | ||||
FPAFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FPAFF and BRRLY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FPAFF and BRRLY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FPAFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FPAFF | 100% | N/A | ||
| BRRLY - FPAFF | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.16% | ||
| CUSI - FPAFF | 16% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FPAFY - FPAFF | 13% Poorly correlated | -1.46% | ||
| CIADY - FPAFF | 11% Poorly correlated | -1.82% | ||
| CIADF - FPAFF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||