CIA
Price
$3.59
Change
+$0.02 (+0.56%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
106.08M
24 days until earnings call
MET
Price
$80.46
Change
-$0.19 (-0.24%)
Updated
Jul 7, 10:41 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
53.28B
23 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CIA vs MET

Header iconCIA vs MET Comparison
Open Charts CIA vs METBanner chart's image
Citizens
Price$3.59
Change+$0.02 (+0.56%)
Volume$163.14K
Capitalization106.08M
MetLife
Price$80.46
Change-$0.19 (-0.24%)
Volume$800
Capitalization53.28B
CIA vs MET Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CIA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CIA vs. MET commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIA is a Hold and MET is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CIA: $3.59 vs. MET: $80.65)
Brand notoriety: CIA: Not notable vs. MET: Notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CIA: 60% vs. MET: 59%
Market capitalization -- CIA: $106.08M vs. MET: $53.28B
CIA [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $106.08M. MET’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $53.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $133.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $24.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CIA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMET’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CIA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MET’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MET is a better buy in the long-term than CIA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CIA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MET’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CIA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MET’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CIA and MET are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CIA (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а +3.46% price change this week, while MET (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was +0.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +0.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.76%.

Reported Earning Dates

CIA is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

MET is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (+0.76% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MET($53.3B) has a higher market cap than CIA($106M). MET has higher P/E ratio than CIA: MET (40.71) vs CIA (4.40). MET YTD gains are higher at: -0.138 vs. CIA (-10.474). MET has more cash in the bank: 308B vs. CIA (1.27B). MET has higher revenues than CIA: MET (66.4B) vs CIA (241M).
CIAMETCIA / MET
Capitalization106M53.3B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-10.474-0.1387,581%
P/E Ratio4.4040.7111%
Revenue241M66.4B0%
Total Cash1.27B308B0%
Total DebtN/A18.8B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CIA vs MET: Fundamental Ratings
CIA
MET
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5027
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10022
SMR RATING
1..100
10099
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5851
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
394
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5045

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MET's Valuation (43) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CIA (76). This means that MET’s stock grew somewhat faster than CIA’s over the last 12 months.

MET's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for CIA (100). This means that MET’s stock grew significantly faster than CIA’s over the last 12 months.

MET's SMR Rating (99) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as CIA (100). This means that MET’s stock grew similarly to CIA’s over the last 12 months.

MET's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as CIA (58). This means that MET’s stock grew similarly to CIA’s over the last 12 months.

CIA's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for MET (94). This means that CIA’s stock grew significantly faster than MET’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIAMET
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CIA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CORN18.160.15
+0.83%
Teucrium Corn Fund
SDY138.790.27
+0.19%
SPDR® S&P Dividend ETF
MYI10.630.02
+0.19%
Blackrock Muniyield Quality Fund III
PRFD50.810.01
+0.01%
PIMCO Preferred and Cp Sec Act Exc-Trd
SZOXF7.01N/A
N/A
Deutsche Bank AG (London Branch)

CIA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIA has been loosely correlated with MET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CIA jumps, then MET could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIA
1D Price
Change %
CIA100%
+0.56%
MET - CIA
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
LNC - CIA
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.57%
PRU - CIA
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.39%
MFC - CIA
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.37%
PRI - CIA
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.93%
More

MET and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MET has been closely correlated with PRU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MET jumps, then PRU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MET
1D Price
Change %
MET100%
+0.62%
PRU - MET
83%
Closely correlated
+0.39%
UNM - MET
80%
Closely correlated
N/A
LNC - MET
80%
Closely correlated
-0.57%
PRI - MET
80%
Closely correlated
+0.93%
CNO - MET
77%
Closely correlated
+1.08%
More