Advertisement
CI vs UNH
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CI is a Hold and UNH is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUNH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- UNH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CI’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UNH’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- UNH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CI (@Managed Health Care) experienced а +1.96% price change this week, while UNH (@Managed Health Care) price change was +0.52% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Managed Health Care industry was -1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.94%.
Reported Earning Dates
CI is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.
UNH is expected to report earnings on Apr 22, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Managed Health Care (-1.25% weekly)Managed healthcare industry focuses on providing health/medical and disability insurance plans, generally intended to reduce the cost of for-profit health care. The insurance products might be provided through employer-paid (fully or partly) insurance and benefit programs, or through Medicare/Medicaid. Some of the largest providers of managed health care include Aetna, Humana Inc., and Cigna, and UnitedHealthcare.
| CI | UNH | CI / UNH | |
| Capitalization | 73.6B | 257B | 29% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 30.5B | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.058 | -13.914 | -0% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.19 | 14.81 | 82% |
| Revenue | 268B | 435B | 62% |
| Total Cash | 6.81B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 34B | 80.1B | 42% |
CI | UNH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 65 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 7 Undervalued | 4 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 48 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 94 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 41 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
UNH's Valuation (4) in the Managed Health Care industry is in the same range as CI (7). This means that UNH’s stock grew similarly to CI’s over the last 12 months.
CI's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the Managed Health Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UNH (100). This means that CI’s stock grew somewhat faster than UNH’s over the last 12 months.
UNH's SMR Rating (48) in the Managed Health Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CI (99). This means that UNH’s stock grew somewhat faster than CI’s over the last 12 months.
CI's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Managed Health Care industry is in the same range as UNH (64). This means that CI’s stock grew similarly to UNH’s over the last 12 months.
CI's P/E Growth Rating (94) in the Managed Health Care industry is in the same range as UNH (96). This means that CI’s stock grew similarly to UNH’s over the last 12 months.
| CI | UNH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 64% | 13 days ago 55% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 52% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 44% |
Advertisement
CI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CI has been loosely correlated with ELV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CI jumps, then ELV could also see price increases.
UNH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UNH has been loosely correlated with HUM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UNH jumps, then HUM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UNH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UNH | 100% | -0.49% | ||
| HUM - UNH | 56% Loosely correlated | +3.11% | ||
| ALHC - UNH | 47% Loosely correlated | +1.06% | ||
| CI - UNH | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.42% | ||
| OSCR - UNH | 7% Poorly correlated | -0.64% | ||
| CVS - UNH | 5% Poorly correlated | +1.87% | ||
More | ||||