CI
Price
$275.73
Change
+$0.87 (+0.32%)
Updated
Dec 26, 02:33 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
73.42B
34 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MOH
Price
$164.85
Change
+$1.38 (+0.84%)
Updated
Dec 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.4B
47 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CI vs MOH

Header iconCI vs MOH Comparison
Open Charts CI vs MOHBanner chart's image
Cigna Group (The)
Price$275.73
Change+$0.87 (+0.32%)
Volume$164
Capitalization73.42B
Molina Healthcare
Price$164.85
Change+$1.38 (+0.84%)
Volume$8.19K
Capitalization8.4B
CI vs MOH Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CI vs. MOH commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CI is a Buy and MOH is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CI: $274.86 vs. MOH: $163.47)
Brand notoriety: CI: Notable vs. MOH: Not notable
Both companies represent the Managed Health Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CI: 26% vs. MOH: 23%
Market capitalization -- CI: $73.42B vs. MOH: $8.4B
CI [@Managed Health Care] is valued at $73.42B. MOH’s [@Managed Health Care] market capitalization is $8.4B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Managed Health Care] industry ranges from $296.73B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Managed Health Care] industry is $44.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMOH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MOH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CI is a better buy in the long-term than MOH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CI’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MOH’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CI’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MOH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MOH is a better buy in the short-term than CI.

Price Growth

CI (@Managed Health Care) experienced а +0.37% price change this week, while MOH (@Managed Health Care) price change was +0.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Managed Health Care industry was -0.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

CI is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2026.

MOH is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Managed Health Care (-0.36% weekly)

Managed healthcare industry focuses on providing health/medical and disability insurance plans, generally intended to reduce the cost of for-profit health care. The insurance products might be provided through employer-paid (fully or partly) insurance and benefit programs, or through Medicare/Medicaid. Some of the largest providers of managed health care include Aetna, Humana Inc., and Cigna, and UnitedHealthcare.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CI($73.4B) has a higher market cap than MOH($8.4B). CI has higher P/E ratio than MOH: CI (12.17) vs MOH (10.07). CI YTD gains are higher at: 1.582 vs. MOH (-43.834). MOH has more cash in the bank: 8.45B vs. CI (6.81B). MOH has less debt than CI: MOH (3.85B) vs CI (34B). CI has higher revenues than MOH: CI (268B) vs MOH (44.6B).
CIMOHCI / MOH
Capitalization73.4B8.4B874%
EBITDAN/A1.52B-
Gain YTD1.582-43.834-4%
P/E Ratio12.1710.07121%
Revenue268B44.6B601%
Total Cash6.81B8.45B81%
Total Debt34B3.85B883%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CI vs MOH: Fundamental Ratings
CI
MOH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5549
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
56100
SMR RATING
1..100
9946
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5964
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9587
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CI's Valuation (7) in the Managed Health Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MOH (72). This means that CI’s stock grew somewhat faster than MOH’s over the last 12 months.

CI's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the Managed Health Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MOH (100). This means that CI’s stock grew somewhat faster than MOH’s over the last 12 months.

MOH's SMR Rating (46) in the Managed Health Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CI (99). This means that MOH’s stock grew somewhat faster than CI’s over the last 12 months.

CI's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Managed Health Care industry is in the same range as MOH (64). This means that CI’s stock grew similarly to MOH’s over the last 12 months.

MOH's P/E Growth Rating (87) in the Managed Health Care industry is in the same range as CI (95). This means that MOH’s stock grew similarly to CI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIMOH
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
58%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MOH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BKMC111.750.15
+0.13%
BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF
IJK99.090.07
+0.07%
iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF
KONG31.00N/A
N/A
Formidable Fortress ETF
ZFEB25.36N/A
N/A
Innovator Equity Defined Prt ETF -1YrFeb
BSMW25.07-0.01
-0.02%
Invesco BulletShares 2032 Muncpl Bd ETF

CI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CI has been loosely correlated with ELV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CI jumps, then ELV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CI
1D Price
Change %
CI100%
+0.41%
ELV - CI
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.02%
CVS - CI
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.38%
MOH - CI
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
HUM - CI
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.83%
UNH - CI
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
More

MOH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MOH has been loosely correlated with ELV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MOH jumps, then ELV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MOH
1D Price
Change %
MOH100%
-0.34%
ELV - MOH
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.02%
CI - MOH
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.41%
OSCR - MOH
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
UNH - MOH
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.86%
CNC - MOH
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.73%
More