CI
Price
$277.86
Change
+$6.86 (+2.53%)
Updated
Jan 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
72.39B
21 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MOH
Price
$193.82
Change
+$4.94 (+2.62%)
Updated
Jan 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
9.71B
21 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CI vs MOH

Header iconCI vs MOH Comparison
Open Charts CI vs MOHBanner chart's image
Cigna Group (The)
Price$277.86
Change+$6.86 (+2.53%)
Volume$7.58K
Capitalization72.39B
Molina Healthcare
Price$193.82
Change+$4.94 (+2.62%)
Volume$13.54K
Capitalization9.71B
CI vs MOH Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CI vs. MOH commentary
Jan 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CI is a Hold and MOH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 16, 2026
Stock price -- (CI: $271.00 vs. MOH: $188.88)
Brand notoriety: CI: Notable vs. MOH: Not notable
Both companies represent the Managed Health Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CI: 106% vs. MOH: 64%
Market capitalization -- CI: $72.39B vs. MOH: $9.71B
CI [@Managed Health Care] is valued at $72.39B. MOH’s [@Managed Health Care] market capitalization is $9.71B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Managed Health Care] industry ranges from $303.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Managed Health Care] industry is $49.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMOH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MOH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CI is a better buy in the long-term than MOH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MOH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MOH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MOH is a better buy in the short-term than CI.

Price Growth

CI (@Managed Health Care) experienced а -2.91% price change this week, while MOH (@Managed Health Care) price change was +7.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Managed Health Care industry was +0.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.18%.

Reported Earning Dates

CI is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

MOH is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Managed Health Care (+0.46% weekly)

Managed healthcare industry focuses on providing health/medical and disability insurance plans, generally intended to reduce the cost of for-profit health care. The insurance products might be provided through employer-paid (fully or partly) insurance and benefit programs, or through Medicare/Medicaid. Some of the largest providers of managed health care include Aetna, Humana Inc., and Cigna, and UnitedHealthcare.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CI($72.4B) has a higher market cap than MOH($9.71B). CI (12.00) and MOH (11.63) have similar P/E ratio . MOH YTD gains are higher at: 8.839 vs. CI (-1.537). MOH has more cash in the bank: 8.45B vs. CI (6.81B). MOH has less debt than CI: MOH (3.85B) vs CI (34B). CI has higher revenues than MOH: CI (268B) vs MOH (44.6B).
CIMOHCI / MOH
Capitalization72.4B9.71B746%
EBITDAN/A1.52B-
Gain YTD-1.5378.839-17%
P/E Ratio12.0011.63103%
Revenue268B44.6B601%
Total Cash6.81B8.45B81%
Total Debt34B3.85B883%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CI vs MOH: Fundamental Ratings
CI
MOH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
929
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
55100
SMR RATING
1..100
9946
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6161
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9679
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CI's Valuation (6) in the Managed Health Care industry is significantly better than the same rating for MOH (74). This means that CI’s stock grew significantly faster than MOH’s over the last 12 months.

CI's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the Managed Health Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MOH (100). This means that CI’s stock grew somewhat faster than MOH’s over the last 12 months.

MOH's SMR Rating (46) in the Managed Health Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CI (99). This means that MOH’s stock grew somewhat faster than CI’s over the last 12 months.

MOH's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Managed Health Care industry is in the same range as CI (61). This means that MOH’s stock grew similarly to CI’s over the last 12 months.

MOH's P/E Growth Rating (79) in the Managed Health Care industry is in the same range as CI (96). This means that MOH’s stock grew similarly to CI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIMOH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MOH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EDEN121.880.97
+0.80%
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF
BBRE95.180.74
+0.78%
JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF
PTEU31.59-0.15
-0.49%
Pacer Trendpilot™ European ETF
SNOY11.24-0.13
-1.14%
YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF
VRTL54.25-1.23
-2.22%
GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF

CI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CI has been loosely correlated with ELV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CI jumps, then ELV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CI
1D Price
Change %
CI100%
-0.30%
ELV - CI
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.58%
CVS - CI
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.67%
MOH - CI
39%
Loosely correlated
+4.39%
HUM - CI
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
UNH - CI
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.31%
More

MOH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MOH has been loosely correlated with ELV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MOH jumps, then ELV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MOH
1D Price
Change %
MOH100%
+4.39%
ELV - MOH
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.58%
CI - MOH
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.30%
OSCR - MOH
37%
Loosely correlated
-3.97%
UNH - MOH
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.31%
CNC - MOH
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
More