Advertisement
CI vs IGA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CI is a Buy and IGA is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
- CI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CI’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- CI’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
CI (@Managed Health Care) experienced а +0.37% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Managed Health Care industry was +0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.42%.
Reported Earning Dates
CI is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Managed Health Care (+0.60% weekly)Managed healthcare industry focuses on providing health/medical and disability insurance plans, generally intended to reduce the cost of for-profit health care. The insurance products might be provided through employer-paid (fully or partly) insurance and benefit programs, or through Medicare/Medicaid. Some of the largest providers of managed health care include Aetna, Humana Inc., and Cigna, and UnitedHealthcare.
CI | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 55 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 7 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CI | IGA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 58% | 10 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 87% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BKMC | 111.75 | 0.15 | +0.13% |
| BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF | |||
| IJK | 99.09 | 0.07 | +0.07% |
| iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF | |||
| KONG | 31.00 | N/A | N/A |
| Formidable Fortress ETF | |||
| ZFEB | 25.36 | N/A | N/A |
| Innovator Equity Defined Prt ETF -1YrFeb | |||
| BSMW | 25.07 | -0.01 | -0.02% |
| Invesco BulletShares 2032 Muncpl Bd ETF | |||
CI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CI has been loosely correlated with ELV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CI jumps, then ELV could also see price increases.
IGA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that IGA and CI have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IGA and CI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IGA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IGA | 100% | +0.20% | ||
| CI - IGA | 15% Poorly correlated | +0.41% | ||
| CSCO - IGA | 14% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| AMGN - IGA | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.75% | ||
| PEP - IGA | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.04% | ||
| CVX - IGA | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.01% | ||
More | ||||