CI
Price
$277.86
Change
+$6.86 (+2.53%)
Updated
Jan 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
72.39B
21 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HUM
Price
$283.95
Change
+$9.81 (+3.58%)
Updated
Jan 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
32.97B
27 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CI vs HUM

Header iconCI vs HUM Comparison
Open Charts CI vs HUMBanner chart's image
Cigna Group (The)
Price$277.86
Change+$6.86 (+2.53%)
Volume$7.58K
Capitalization72.39B
Humana
Price$283.95
Change+$9.81 (+3.58%)
Volume$8.57K
Capitalization32.97B
CI vs HUM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CI vs. HUM commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CI is a Hold and HUM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (CI: $271.00 vs. HUM: $274.14)
Brand notoriety: CI and HUM are both notable
Both companies represent the Managed Health Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CI: 106% vs. HUM: 70%
Market capitalization -- CI: $72.39B vs. HUM: $32.97B
CI [@Managed Health Care] is valued at $72.39B. HUM’s [@Managed Health Care] market capitalization is $32.97B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Managed Health Care] industry ranges from $303.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Managed Health Care] industry is $49.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHUM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HUM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HUM is a better buy in the long-term than CI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • HUM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HUM is a better buy in the short-term than CI.

Price Growth

CI (@Managed Health Care) experienced а -2.91% price change this week, while HUM (@Managed Health Care) price change was -0.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Managed Health Care industry was -0.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

CI is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

HUM is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Managed Health Care (-0.41% weekly)

Managed healthcare industry focuses on providing health/medical and disability insurance plans, generally intended to reduce the cost of for-profit health care. The insurance products might be provided through employer-paid (fully or partly) insurance and benefit programs, or through Medicare/Medicaid. Some of the largest providers of managed health care include Aetna, Humana Inc., and Cigna, and UnitedHealthcare.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CI($72.4B) has a higher market cap than HUM($33B). HUM has higher P/E ratio than CI: HUM (25.64) vs CI (12.00). HUM YTD gains are higher at: 7.032 vs. CI (-1.537). HUM has less debt than CI: HUM (12.6B) vs CI (34B). CI has higher revenues than HUM: CI (268B) vs HUM (126B).
CIHUMCI / HUM
Capitalization72.4B33B219%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.5377.032-22%
P/E Ratio12.0025.6447%
Revenue268B126B213%
Total Cash6.81BN/A-
Total Debt34B12.6B270%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CI vs HUM: Fundamental Ratings
CI
HUM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
911
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
55100
SMR RATING
1..100
9998
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6150
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9648
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CI's Valuation (6) in the Managed Health Care industry is in the same range as HUM (16). This means that CI’s stock grew similarly to HUM’s over the last 12 months.

CI's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the Managed Health Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUM (100). This means that CI’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUM’s over the last 12 months.

HUM's SMR Rating (98) in the Managed Health Care industry is in the same range as CI (99). This means that HUM’s stock grew similarly to CI’s over the last 12 months.

HUM's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Managed Health Care industry is in the same range as CI (61). This means that HUM’s stock grew similarly to CI’s over the last 12 months.

HUM's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the Managed Health Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CI (96). This means that HUM’s stock grew somewhat faster than CI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIHUM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HUM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RNIN28.330.14
+0.48%
Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF
BOTZ38.000.15
+0.40%
Global X Robotics & Artfcl Intllgnc ETF
SPWO28.850.05
+0.17%
SP Funds S&P World ETF
FTRB25.450.01
+0.04%
Federated Hermes Total Return Bond ETF
EFZ12.29-0.01
-0.04%
ProShares Short MSCI EAFE

CI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CI has been loosely correlated with ELV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CI jumps, then ELV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CI
1D Price
Change %
CI100%
-0.30%
ELV - CI
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.58%
CVS - CI
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.67%
MOH - CI
39%
Loosely correlated
+4.39%
HUM - CI
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
UNH - CI
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.31%
More

HUM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUM has been loosely correlated with ELV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HUM jumps, then ELV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUM
1D Price
Change %
HUM100%
+0.07%
ELV - HUM
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.58%
UNH - HUM
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.31%
ALHC - HUM
47%
Loosely correlated
+3.94%
CI - HUM
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.30%
CVS - HUM
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.67%
More