CI
Price
$296.86
Change
+$6.51 (+2.24%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
79.24B
74 days until earnings call
HUM
Price
$286.39
Change
+$5.05 (+1.79%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
34.44B
80 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CI vs HUM

Header iconCI vs HUM Comparison
Open Charts CI vs HUMBanner chart's image
Cigna Group (The)
Price$296.86
Change+$6.51 (+2.24%)
Volume$2.92M
Capitalization79.24B
Humana
Price$286.39
Change+$5.05 (+1.79%)
Volume$1.74M
Capitalization34.44B
CI vs HUM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HUM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CI vs. HUM commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CI is a Hold and HUM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (CI: $290.35 vs. HUM: $281.34)
Brand notoriety: CI and HUM are both notable
Both companies represent the Publishing: Books/Magazines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CI: 102% vs. HUM: 68%
Market capitalization -- CI: $79.24B vs. HUM: $34.44B
CI [@Publishing: Books/Magazines] is valued at $79.24B. HUM’s [@Publishing: Books/Magazines] market capitalization is $34.44B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Publishing: Books/Magazines] industry ranges from $275.33B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Publishing: Books/Magazines] industry is $38.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHUM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HUM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CI is a better buy in the long-term than HUM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CI’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HUM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HUM is a better buy in the short-term than CI.

Price Growth

CI (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) experienced а +7.14% price change this week, while HUM (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) price change was +9.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Publishing: Books/Magazines industry was +4.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

CI is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

HUM is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Publishing: Books/Magazines (+4.43% weekly)

The industry includes companies that publish and market books and magazines/periodicals. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Meredith Corporation and Scholastic Corporation are some of the biggest companies in this industry. Like many other industries, publishing companies have branched out into online/digital publications (while retaining their original print business), to capture the burgeoning market in electronic media. Business could be cyclical in certain cases, since weak consumer sentiment during an economic downturn might depress sales of some magazines and books.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CI($79.2B) has a higher market cap than HUM($34.4B). HUM has higher P/E ratio than CI: HUM (21.95) vs CI (16.28). HUM YTD gains are higher at: 11.666 vs. CI (6.172). HUM has more cash in the bank: 21.7B vs. CI (5.14B). HUM has less debt than CI: HUM (12.6B) vs CI (30.8B). CI has higher revenues than HUM: CI (261B) vs HUM (123B).
CIHUMCI / HUM
Capitalization79.2B34.4B230%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.17211.66653%
P/E Ratio16.2821.9574%
Revenue261B123B212%
Total Cash5.14B21.7B24%
Total Debt30.8B12.6B244%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CI vs HUM: Fundamental Ratings
CI
HUM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1213
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
35100
SMR RATING
1..100
9998
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6243
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9172
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CI's Valuation (27) in the Managed Health Care industry is in the same range as HUM (42). This means that CI’s stock grew similarly to HUM’s over the last 12 months.

CI's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Managed Health Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUM (100). This means that CI’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUM’s over the last 12 months.

HUM's SMR Rating (98) in the Managed Health Care industry is in the same range as CI (99). This means that HUM’s stock grew similarly to CI’s over the last 12 months.

HUM's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Managed Health Care industry is in the same range as CI (62). This means that HUM’s stock grew similarly to CI’s over the last 12 months.

HUM's P/E Growth Rating (72) in the Managed Health Care industry is in the same range as CI (91). This means that HUM’s stock grew similarly to CI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIHUM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HUM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DBO13.410.21
+1.59%
Invesco DB Oil
MAXJ27.820.02
+0.07%
iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF
FCEF22.58-0.02
-0.07%
First Trust Income Opportunity ETF
VEU69.22-0.29
-0.42%
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US ETF
KXI65.86-0.44
-0.66%
iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF

CI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CI has been loosely correlated with ELV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CI jumps, then ELV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CI
1D Price
Change %
CI100%
+1.13%
ELV - CI
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.34%
CVS - CI
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.26%
MOH - CI
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.98%
HUM - CI
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
CNC - CI
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.52%
More

HUM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUM has been loosely correlated with CVS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HUM jumps, then CVS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUM
1D Price
Change %
HUM100%
-0.23%
CVS - HUM
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.26%
ELV - HUM
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.34%
ALHC - HUM
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.41%
CI - HUM
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
MOH - HUM
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.98%
More