CI
Price
$275.33
Change
-$0.06 (-0.02%)
Updated
Feb 4, 02:32 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
73.56B
One day until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CVS
Price
$76.44
Change
-$0.39 (-0.51%)
Updated
Feb 4, 02:34 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
97.53B
7 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CI vs CVS

Header iconCI vs CVS Comparison
Open Charts CI vs CVSBanner chart's image
Cigna Group (The)
Price$275.33
Change-$0.06 (-0.02%)
Volume$1.34K
Capitalization73.56B
CVS HEALTH
Price$76.44
Change-$0.39 (-0.51%)
Volume$4.61K
Capitalization97.53B
CI vs CVS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CI vs. CVS commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CI is a Hold and CVS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (CI: $275.39 vs. CVS: $76.83)
Brand notoriety: CI and CVS are both notable
Both companies represent the Managed Health Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CI: 91% vs. CVS: 83%
Market capitalization -- CI: $73.56B vs. CVS: $97.53B
CI [@Managed Health Care] is valued at $73.56B. CVS’s [@Managed Health Care] market capitalization is $97.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Managed Health Care] industry ranges from $257.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Managed Health Care] industry is $43.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCVS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CVS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CVS is a better buy in the long-term than CI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CI’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CVS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CVS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CVS is a better buy in the short-term than CI.

Price Growth

CI (@Managed Health Care) experienced а +1.96% price change this week, while CVS (@Managed Health Care) price change was +6.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Managed Health Care industry was -1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

CI is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

CVS is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Managed Health Care (-1.25% weekly)

Managed healthcare industry focuses on providing health/medical and disability insurance plans, generally intended to reduce the cost of for-profit health care. The insurance products might be provided through employer-paid (fully or partly) insurance and benefit programs, or through Medicare/Medicaid. Some of the largest providers of managed health care include Aetna, Humana Inc., and Cigna, and UnitedHealthcare.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CVS($97.5B) has a higher market cap than CI($73.6B). CVS has higher P/E ratio than CI: CVS (202.18) vs CI (12.19). CI YTD gains are higher at: 0.058 vs. CVS (-2.391). CI has less debt than CVS: CI (34B) vs CVS (81.8B). CVS has higher revenues than CI: CVS (394B) vs CI (268B).
CICVSCI / CVS
Capitalization73.6B97.5B75%
EBITDAN/A10.6B-
Gain YTD0.058-2.391-2%
P/E Ratio12.19202.186%
Revenue268B394B68%
Total Cash6.81BN/A-
Total Debt34B81.8B42%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CI vs CVS: Fundamental Ratings
CI
CVS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
721
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5879
SMR RATING
1..100
9989
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5952
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
941
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CI's Valuation (7) in the Managed Health Care industry is in the same range as CVS (14) in the Drugstore Chains industry. This means that CI’s stock grew similarly to CVS’s over the last 12 months.

CI's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the Managed Health Care industry is in the same range as CVS (79) in the Drugstore Chains industry. This means that CI’s stock grew similarly to CVS’s over the last 12 months.

CVS's SMR Rating (89) in the Drugstore Chains industry is in the same range as CI (99) in the Managed Health Care industry. This means that CVS’s stock grew similarly to CI’s over the last 12 months.

CVS's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Drugstore Chains industry is in the same range as CI (59) in the Managed Health Care industry. This means that CVS’s stock grew similarly to CI’s over the last 12 months.

CVS's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Drugstore Chains industry is significantly better than the same rating for CI (94) in the Managed Health Care industry. This means that CVS’s stock grew significantly faster than CI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CICVS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
57%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CVS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AFK28.480.39
+1.39%
VanEck Africa ETF
MLN17.530.02
+0.11%
VanEck Long Muni ETF
SPIB33.76-0.01
-0.03%
State Street SPDR Port ItmtTermCorpBdETF
MEDX33.68-0.17
-0.52%
Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF
TSLO19.00-0.33
-1.72%
Leverage Shares 2x Cpd Acclrtd TSLAMnETF

CI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CI has been loosely correlated with ELV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CI jumps, then ELV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CI
1D Price
Change %
CI100%
+1.42%
ELV - CI
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.93%
CVS - CI
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.87%
MOH - CI
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
HUM - CI
35%
Loosely correlated
+3.11%
CNC - CI
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.68%
More

CVS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CVS has been loosely correlated with HUM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CVS jumps, then HUM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CVS
1D Price
Change %
CVS100%
+1.87%
HUM - CVS
44%
Loosely correlated
+3.11%
ELV - CVS
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.93%
CI - CVS
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.42%
UNH - CVS
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
ALHC - CVS
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.06%
More