NVO | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 12 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 85 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 15 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 82 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CHW | NVO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 56% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 82% | 8 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 59% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TUG | 39.82 | -0.81 | -1.98% |
| STF Tactical Growth ETF | |||
| SNSR | 36.44 | -0.76 | -2.03% |
| Global X Internet of Things ETF | |||
| VBK | 291.77 | -10.29 | -3.41% |
| Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF | |||
| DPST | 84.69 | -3.14 | -3.58% |
| Direxion Daily Regional Bnks Bull 3X ETF | |||
| SMCX | 18.34 | -3.24 | -15.01% |
| Defiance Daily Target 2X Long SMCI ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor tells us that CHW and ASML have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHW and ASML's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHW | 100% | -1.59% | ||
| ASML - CHW | 12% Poorly correlated | -1.68% | ||
| MSFT - CHW | 12% Poorly correlated | -1.54% | ||
| AAPL - CHW | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.19% | ||
| LLY - CHW | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.50% | ||
| NVO - CHW | 5% Poorly correlated | -2.19% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NVO has been closely correlated with NONOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NVO jumps, then NONOF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NVO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVO | 100% | -2.19% | ||
| NONOF - NVO | 70% Closely correlated | -0.83% | ||
| TECH - NVO | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.06% | ||
| GMAB - NVO | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.75% | ||
| MRK - NVO | 34% Loosely correlated | +1.62% | ||
| BIIB - NVO | 34% Loosely correlated | +2.01% | ||
More | ||||