Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CHW vs HGLB
CHW vs HGLB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CHW vs. HGLB commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHW is a Hold and HGLB is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHW has more net assets: 520M vs. HGLB (299M). HGLB has a higher annual dividend yield than CHW: HGLB (58.811) vs CHW (14.947). CHW was incepted earlier than HGLB: CHW (18 years) vs HGLB (28 years). HGLB (2.67) has a lower expense ratio than CHW (4.28). CHW has a higher turnover HGLB (13.00) vs HGLB (13.00).
| CHW | HGLB | CHW / HGLB | |
| Gain YTD | 14.947 | 58.811 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 520M | 299M | 174% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 4.28 | 2.67 | 160% |
| Turnover | 62.00 | 13.00 | 477% |
| Yield | 0.21 | 2.32 | 9% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 28 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CHW | HGLB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 88% | 7 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 81% | 7 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 73% | 7 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 86% | 7 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 83% | 7 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 87% | 7 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 83% | 14 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 86% | 7 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 75% | 7 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CHW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CHW and ASML have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHW and ASML's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHW | 100% | -0.68% | ||
| ASML - CHW | 12% Poorly correlated | +1.88% | ||
| MSFT - CHW | 12% Poorly correlated | +0.68% | ||
| AAPL - CHW | 11% Poorly correlated | +1.11% | ||
| LLY - CHW | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.16% | ||
| NVO - CHW | 5% Poorly correlated | -2.04% | ||
More | ||||
HGLB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HGLB has been loosely correlated with ET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HGLB jumps, then ET could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HGLB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HGLB | 100% | -1.62% | ||
| ET - HGLB | 33% Loosely correlated | -1.54% | ||
| WSR - HGLB | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.80% | ||
| WMB - HGLB | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.99% | ||
| PLYM - HGLB | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.14% | ||
| NXRT - HGLB | 12% Poorly correlated | +0.10% |