Ad is loading...
CHVKY
Price
Loading...
Change
Loading...
Updated
Loading...
SIOLY
Price
Loading...
Change
Loading...
Updated
Loading...
Ad is loading...

CHVKY vs SIOLY

Header iconCHVKY vs SIOLY Comparison
Open Charts CHVKY vs SIOLYBanner chart's image
China Vanke
PriceLoading...
ChangeLoading...
Volume$166K
CapitalizationN/A
Sino-Ocean Group Holdings
PriceLoading...
ChangeLoading...
Volume$107
CapitalizationN/A
CHVKY vs SIOLY Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHVKY vs. SIOLY commentary
Nov 24, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHVKY is a Hold and SIOLY is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 24, 2024
Stock price -- (CHVKY: $0.35 vs. SIOLY: $0.80)
Brand notoriety: CHVKY and SIOLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHVKY: 478% vs. SIOLY: 1%
Market capitalization -- CHVKY: $23.67B vs. SIOLY: $458.79M
CHVKY [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $23.67B. SIOLY’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $458.79M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHVKY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSIOLY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CHVKY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SIOLY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CHVKY is a better buy in the long-term than SIOLY.

Price Growth

CHVKY (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -38.60% price change this week, while SIOLY (@Real Estate Development) price change was -3.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -1.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.82%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (-1.07% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHVKY($23.7B) has a higher market cap than SIOLY($459M). SIOLY has higher P/E ratio than CHVKY: SIOLY (9.36) vs CHVKY (4.35). CHVKY YTD gains are higher at: 0.086 vs. SIOLY (-23.457). CHVKY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 57.8B vs. SIOLY (10.2B). CHVKY has higher revenues than SIOLY: CHVKY (510B) vs SIOLY (67.1B).
CHVKYSIOLYCHVKY / SIOLY
Capitalization23.7B459M5,163%
EBITDA57.8B10.2B567%
Gain YTD0.086-23.457-0%
P/E Ratio4.359.3646%
Revenue510B67.1B760%
Total CashN/A15.4B-
Total DebtN/A95.2B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SIOLY: Fundamental Ratings
SIOLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
88
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
87
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME28.450.88
+3.19%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X94339.4900001995.703100
+2.16%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
AAPL229.000.72
+0.32%
Apple
SPY590.500.20
+0.03%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA342.03-3.97
-1.15%
Tesla

CHVKY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CHVKY and HLPPY have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHVKY and HLPPY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHVKY
1D Price
Change %
CHVKY100%
N/A
HLPPY - CHVKY
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.75%
SIOLY - CHVKY
31%
Poorly correlated
+4.99%
CAOVY - CHVKY
31%
Poorly correlated
-5.42%
CHVKF - CHVKY
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AGPYY - CHVKY
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SIOLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SIOLY has been loosely correlated with HLPPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SIOLY jumps, then HLPPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SIOLY
1D Price
Change %
SIOLY100%
+4.99%
HLPPF - SIOLY
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SOLLY - SIOLY
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CHVKY - SIOLY
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHVKF - SIOLY
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YUPRF - SIOLY
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More