CHVKF
Price
$0.66
Change
-$0.11 (-14.29%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
23.67B
HLPPF
Price
$1.00
Change
+$0.03 (+3.09%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
6.98B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHVKF vs HLPPF

Header iconCHVKF vs HLPPF Comparison
Open Charts CHVKF vs HLPPFBanner chart's image
China Vanke
Price$0.66
Change-$0.11 (-14.29%)
Volume$4K
Capitalization23.67B
Hang Lung Properties
Price$1.00
Change+$0.03 (+3.09%)
Volume$2.01K
Capitalization6.98B
CHVKF vs HLPPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CHVKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLPPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHVKF vs. HLPPF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHVKF is a Hold and HLPPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CHVKF: $0.66 vs. HLPPF: $1.00)
Brand notoriety: CHVKF and HLPPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHVKF: 387% vs. HLPPF: 193%
Market capitalization -- CHVKF: $23.67B vs. HLPPF: $6.98B
CHVKF [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $23.67B. HLPPF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $6.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHVKF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHLPPF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CHVKF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HLPPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HLPPF is a better buy in the long-term than CHVKF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHVKF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HLPPF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHVKF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • HLPPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CHVKF and HLPPF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CHVKF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HLPPF (@Real Estate Development) price change was +19.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +2.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.21%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+2.35% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHVKF($23.7B) has a higher market cap than HLPPF($6.98B). HLPPF has higher P/E ratio than CHVKF: HLPPF (12.32) vs CHVKF (6.02). HLPPF YTD gains are higher at: 18.881 vs. CHVKF (-6.369). CHVKF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 57.8B vs. HLPPF (6.49B). CHVKF has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. HLPPF (4.73B). HLPPF has less debt than CHVKF: HLPPF (44.7B) vs CHVKF (346B). CHVKF has higher revenues than HLPPF: CHVKF (510B) vs HLPPF (10.6B).
CHVKFHLPPFCHVKF / HLPPF
Capitalization23.7B6.98B339%
EBITDA57.8B6.49B890%
Gain YTD-6.36918.881-34%
P/E Ratio6.0212.3249%
Revenue510B10.6B4,811%
Total Cash140B4.73B2,960%
Total Debt346B44.7B774%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHVKF vs HLPPF: Fundamental Ratings
CHVKF
HLPPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9599
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6443
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
667
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CHVKF's Valuation (6) in the null industry is in the same range as HLPPF (14). This means that CHVKF’s stock grew similarly to HLPPF’s over the last 12 months.

CHVKF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as HLPPF (100). This means that CHVKF’s stock grew similarly to HLPPF’s over the last 12 months.

CHVKF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as HLPPF (99). This means that CHVKF’s stock grew similarly to HLPPF’s over the last 12 months.

HLPPF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as CHVKF (64). This means that HLPPF’s stock grew similarly to CHVKF’s over the last 12 months.

HLPPF's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHVKF (66). This means that HLPPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHVKF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHVKFHLPPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
26%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
28%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHVKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLPPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VONE284.142.11
+0.75%
Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF
DEUS57.030.33
+0.59%
Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF
COMT26.27N/A
N/A
iShares GSCI Cmd Dyn Roll Stgy ETF
IWFL46.90N/A
N/A
ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Gr Fctr TR ETN
ETHT40.90-1.05
-2.50%
Proshares Ultra Ether ETF

CHVKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHVKF has been loosely correlated with AGPYY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHVKF jumps, then AGPYY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHVKF
1D Price
Change %
CHVKF100%
N/A
AGPYY - CHVKF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HLPPF - CHVKF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SOLLY - CHVKF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
WRFRF - CHVKF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
XIN - CHVKF
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.16%
More

HLPPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLPPF has been loosely correlated with SOLLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HLPPF jumps, then SOLLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLPPF
1D Price
Change %
HLPPF100%
N/A
SOLLY - HLPPF
57%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AGPYY - HLPPF
57%
Loosely correlated
N/A
YUPRF - HLPPF
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SIOLY - HLPPF
39%
Loosely correlated
-9.09%
CHVKF - HLPPF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More