Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CHUSX vs RNPAX
CHUSX vs RNPAX Comparison
Open Charts CHUSX vs RNPAX
Alger Global Equity A
Price$30.78
Change+$0.06 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.92M
American Funds New Perspective R1
Price$66.68
Change+$0.35 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.39B
CHUSX vs RNPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CHUSX vs. RNPAX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHUSX is a Buy and RNPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPAX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. CHUSX (21.9M). CHUSX (0.00) and RNPAX (0.00) have matching dividends . CHUSX was incepted earlier than RNPAX: CHUSX (22 years) vs RNPAX (23 years). CHUSX (2.54) is less costly to investors than RNPAX (1.49). CHUSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 93.65 vs. RNPAX (24.00). RNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CHUSX: RNPAX (250) vs CHUSX (1000). RNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.60 vs. CHUSX (-5.09). RNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.61 vs. CHUSX (16.81).
| CHUSX | RNPAX | CHUSX / RNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.49 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.54 | 1.49 | 170% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.362 | 16.921 | 61% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.9M | 161B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.09 | 9.60 | -53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.64 | 57.78 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.81 | 34.61 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.43 | 99.83 | 77% |