CHUEF
Price
$12.67
Change
+$0.39 (+3.18%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
9.57B
ESOCF
Price
$9.57
Change
-$0.20 (-2.05%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
70.24B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHUEF vs ESOCF

Header iconCHUEF vs ESOCF Comparison
Open Charts CHUEF vs ESOCFBanner chart's image
Chubu Electric Power
Price$12.67
Change+$0.39 (+3.18%)
Volume$5.71K
Capitalization9.57B
ENEL Societa per Azioni
Price$9.57
Change-$0.20 (-2.05%)
Volume$8.23K
Capitalization70.24B
CHUEF vs ESOCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CHUEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ESOCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHUEF vs. ESOCF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHUEF is a Hold and ESOCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CHUEF: $12.67 vs. ESOCF: $9.57)
Brand notoriety: CHUEF and ESOCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHUEF: 110% vs. ESOCF: 38%
Market capitalization -- CHUEF: $9.57B vs. ESOCF: $70.24B
CHUEF [@Electric Utilities] is valued at $9.57B. ESOCF’s [@Electric Utilities] market capitalization is $70.24B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electric Utilities] industry ranges from $131.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electric Utilities] industry is $18.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHUEF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileESOCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CHUEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ESOCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CHUEF is a better buy in the long-term than ESOCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHUEF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ESOCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHUEF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • ESOCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ESOCF is a better buy in the short-term than CHUEF.

Price Growth

CHUEF (@Electric Utilities) experienced а +24.58% price change this week, while ESOCF (@Electric Utilities) price change was +0.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was -0.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.83%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (-0.13% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ESOCF($70.2B) has a higher market cap than CHUEF($9.58B). CHUEF has higher P/E ratio than ESOCF: CHUEF (33.00) vs ESOCF (20.28). ESOCF YTD gains are higher at: 34.257 vs. CHUEF (25.944). ESOCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 20.6B vs. CHUEF (-37.09B). CHUEF has more cash in the bank: 387B vs. ESOCF (29.5B). ESOCF has less debt than CHUEF: ESOCF (80.2B) vs CHUEF (2.68T). CHUEF has higher revenues than ESOCF: CHUEF (3.69T) vs ESOCF (141B).
CHUEFESOCFCHUEF / ESOCF
Capitalization9.58B70.2B14%
EBITDA-37.09B20.6B-180%
Gain YTD25.94434.25776%
P/E Ratio33.0020.28163%
Revenue3.69T141B2,618%
Total Cash387B29.5B1,312%
Total Debt2.68T80.2B3,347%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHUEF vs ESOCF: Fundamental Ratings
CHUEF
ESOCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10071
SMR RATING
1..100
10047
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4945
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1077
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CHUEF's Valuation (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ESOCF (96). This means that CHUEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ESOCF’s over the last 12 months.

ESOCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as CHUEF (100). This means that ESOCF’s stock grew similarly to CHUEF’s over the last 12 months.

ESOCF's SMR Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHUEF (100). This means that ESOCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHUEF’s over the last 12 months.

ESOCF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as CHUEF (49). This means that ESOCF’s stock grew similarly to CHUEF’s over the last 12 months.

CHUEF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ESOCF (77). This means that CHUEF’s stock grew significantly faster than ESOCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHUEFESOCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
40%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHUEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ESOCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SENS0.500.01
+2.55%
Senseonics Holdings
ECVT8.400.10
+1.27%
Ecovyst
APH99.460.94
+0.95%
Amphenol Corp
CPBI14.890.04
+0.27%
Central Plains Bancshares
AGI26.990.02
+0.07%
Alamos Gold

CHUEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CHUEF and ESOCF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHUEF and ESOCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHUEF
1D Price
Change %
CHUEF100%
N/A
ESOCF - CHUEF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.05%
CKISF - CHUEF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDUAF - CHUEF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
CLPHF - CHUEF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CPXWF - CHUEF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
More

ESOCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESOCF has been loosely correlated with RWEOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ESOCF jumps, then RWEOY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ESOCF
1D Price
Change %
ESOCF100%
-2.05%
RWEOY - ESOCF
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.23%
EDPFY - ESOCF
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.31%
IBDSF - ESOCF
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.38%
ACLLF - ESOCF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
HRNNF - ESOCF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More