CHUEF
Price
$12.74
Change
+$0.25 (+2.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
9.57B
CKISY
Price
$32.47
Change
-$0.33 (-1.01%)
Updated
Jul 10 closing price
Capitalization
13.33B
3 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHUEF vs CKISY

Header iconCHUEF vs CKISY Comparison
Open Charts CHUEF vs CKISYBanner chart's image
Chubu Electric Power
Price$12.74
Change+$0.25 (+2.00%)
Volume$2.25K
Capitalization9.57B
CK Infrastructure Holdings
Price$32.47
Change-$0.33 (-1.01%)
Volume$615
Capitalization13.33B
CHUEF vs CKISY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CHUEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CKISY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHUEF vs. CKISY commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHUEF is a Hold and CKISY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (CHUEF: $12.74 vs. CKISY: $32.47)
Brand notoriety: CHUEF and CKISY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHUEF: 57% vs. CKISY: 119%
Market capitalization -- CHUEF: $9.57B vs. CKISY: $13.33B
CHUEF [@Electric Utilities] is valued at $9.57B. CKISY’s [@Electric Utilities] market capitalization is $13.33B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electric Utilities] industry ranges from $131.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electric Utilities] industry is $18.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHUEF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCKISY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CHUEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CKISY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CHUEF is a better buy in the long-term than CKISY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHUEF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CKISY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHUEF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CKISY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CKISY is a better buy in the short-term than CHUEF.

Price Growth

CHUEF (@Electric Utilities) experienced а +2.00% price change this week, while CKISY (@Electric Utilities) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was +1.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.32%.

Reported Earning Dates

CKISY is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (+1.21% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CKISY($13.3B) has a higher market cap than CHUEF($9.58B). CHUEF has higher P/E ratio than CKISY: CHUEF (33.00) vs CKISY (12.33). CHUEF YTD gains are higher at: 26.640 vs. CKISY (8.641). CKISY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.28B vs. CHUEF (-37.09B). CHUEF has higher revenues than CKISY: CHUEF (3.69T) vs CKISY (6.62B).
CHUEFCKISYCHUEF / CKISY
Capitalization9.58B13.3B72%
EBITDA-37.09B9.28B-400%
Gain YTD26.6408.641308%
P/E Ratio33.0012.33268%
Revenue3.69T6.62B55,813%
Total Cash387BN/A-
Total Debt2.68TN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHUEF vs CKISY: Fundamental Ratings
CHUEF
CKISY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10024
SMR RATING
1..100
10097
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4254
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1058
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CHUEF's Valuation (43) in the null industry is in the same range as CKISY (48). This means that CHUEF’s stock grew similarly to CKISY’s over the last 12 months.

CKISY's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CHUEF (100). This means that CKISY’s stock grew significantly faster than CHUEF’s over the last 12 months.

CKISY's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as CHUEF (100). This means that CKISY’s stock grew similarly to CHUEF’s over the last 12 months.

CHUEF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as CKISY (54). This means that CHUEF’s stock grew similarly to CKISY’s over the last 12 months.

CHUEF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CKISY (58). This means that CHUEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CKISY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHUEFCKISY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
26%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
25%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
13%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHUEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CKISY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CHY11.030.01
+0.09%
Calamos Convertible and High Income Fund
IGLD21.84-0.12
-0.55%
FT Vest Gold Strategy Trgt Inc ETF
SDD14.75-0.16
-1.04%
ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600
IJR112.91-1.24
-1.09%
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
IBLC43.72-0.62
-1.41%
iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF

CHUEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CHUEF and ESOCF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHUEF and ESOCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHUEF
1D Price
Change %
CHUEF100%
+2.00%
ESOCF - CHUEF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.46%
CKISF - CHUEF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDUAF - CHUEF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.49%
CLPHF - CHUEF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CPXWF - CHUEF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
More

CKISY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CKISY and CLPHF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CKISY and CLPHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CKISY
1D Price
Change %
CKISY100%
N/A
CLPHF - CKISY
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AGLXY - CKISY
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
CLPHY - CKISY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CPXWF - CKISY
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
CHUEF - CKISY
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.00%
More