Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CHTTX vs VEVYX
CHTTX vs VEVYX Comparison
Open Charts CHTTX vs VEVYX
AMG River Road Mid Cap Value N
Price$20.56
Change+$0.43 (+2.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets385.39M
Victory Sycamore Established Value Y
Price$48.71
Change+$0.64 (+1.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.2B
CHTTX vs VEVYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CHTTX vs. VEVYX commentary
Feb 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHTTX is a Buy and VEVYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VEVYX has more cash in the bank: 16.2B vs. CHTTX (385M). VEVYX pays higher dividends than CHTTX: VEVYX (0.89) vs CHTTX (0.15). CHTTX was incepted earlier than VEVYX: CHTTX (31 years) vs VEVYX (13 years). CHTTX (1.14) is less costly to investors than VEVYX (0.66). CHTTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 93.00 vs. VEVYX (45.00). CHTTX has a lower initial minimum investment than VEVYX: CHTTX (2000) vs VEVYX (1000000). VEVYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.70 vs. CHTTX (-1.01). VEVYX return over 5 years is better than : 21.18 vs. CHTTX (-42.56).
| CHTTX | VEVYX | CHTTX / VEVYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.66 | 168% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.66 | 173% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.629 | 8.196 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 385M | 16.2B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 0.89 | 16% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.01 | 3.70 | -27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.71 | 4.99 | 235% |
| Returns for 5 years | -42.56 | 21.18 | -201% |
| Returns for 10 years | -31.60 | 91.18 | -35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers