Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CHTTX vs FLPSX
CHTTX vs FLPSX Comparison
Open Charts CHTTX vs FLPSX
AMG River Road Mid Cap Value N
Price$20.22
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets366.8M
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock
Price$41.65
Change+$0.05 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.04B
CHTTX vs FLPSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CHTTX vs. FLPSX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHTTX is a StrongBuy and FLPSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLPSX has more cash in the bank: 23B vs. CHTTX (367M). FLPSX pays higher dividends than CHTTX: FLPSX (1.89) vs CHTTX (0.27). CHTTX was incepted earlier than FLPSX: CHTTX (31 years) vs FLPSX (36 years). CHTTX (1.14) is less costly to investors than FLPSX (0.87). CHTTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FLPSX (22.00). FLPSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CHTTX: FLPSX (0) vs CHTTX (2000). FLPSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.94 vs. CHTTX (-0.88). FLPSX return over 5 years is better than : -6.41 vs. CHTTX (-38.90).
| CHTTX | FLPSX | CHTTX / FLPSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.87 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.87 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 36 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.248 | 3.551 | 7% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 367M | 23B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.27 | 1.89 | 14% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.88 | 2.94 | -30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.47 | -5.25 | -428% |
| Returns for 5 years | -38.90 | -6.41 | 607% |
| Returns for 10 years | -43.78 | -5.13 | 853% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers