CHTH
Price
$3.57
Change
+$0.61 (+20.61%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Capitalization
613.11M
LNSPF
Price
$2.80
Change
+$0.07 (+2.56%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
2.34B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHTH vs LNSPF

Header iconCHTH vs LNSPF Comparison
Open Charts CHTH vs LNSPFBanner chart's image
CNL Healthcare Pptys
Price$3.57
Change+$0.61 (+20.61%)
Volume$4.79K
Capitalization613.11M
London & Stamford Property
Price$2.80
Change+$0.07 (+2.56%)
Volume$1.54K
Capitalization2.34B
CHTH vs LNSPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CHTH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LNSPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHTH vs. LNSPF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHTH is a Hold and LNSPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CHTH: $3.57 vs. LNSPF: $2.80)
Brand notoriety: CHTH and LNSPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHTH: 260% vs. LNSPF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CHTH: $613.11M vs. LNSPF: $2.34B
CHTH [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $613.11M. LNSPF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $2.34B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHTH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLNSPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CHTH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LNSPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CHTH is a better buy in the long-term than LNSPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHTH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LNSPF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHTH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • LNSPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CHTH is a better buy in the short-term than LNSPF.

Price Growth

CHTH (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LNSPF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +2.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +1.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+1.40% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LNSPF($2.34B) has a higher market cap than CHTH($613M). CHTH YTD gains are higher at: 27.500 vs. LNSPF (24.151). CHTH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 68M vs. LNSPF (-477.5M). CHTH has more cash in the bank: 54.1M vs. LNSPF (23.9M). CHTH has less debt than LNSPF: CHTH (578M) vs LNSPF (1.02B). CHTH has higher revenues than LNSPF: CHTH (341M) vs LNSPF (147M).
CHTHLNSPFCHTH / LNSPF
Capitalization613M2.34B26%
EBITDA68M-477.5M-14%
Gain YTD27.50024.151114%
P/E RatioN/A7.23-
Revenue341M147M232%
Total Cash54.1M23.9M226%
Total Debt578M1.02B57%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LNSPF: Fundamental Ratings
LNSPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
81
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
91
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHTHLNSPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
32%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
35%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHTH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LNSPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RSEGX54.640.77
+1.43%
Victory RS Small Cap Growth A
JLGMX89.410.94
+1.06%
JPMorgan Large Cap Growth R6
FVADX61.780.53
+0.87%
Franklin Small Cap Value Adv
ACSMX11.450.09
+0.79%
Advisors Capital Small/Mid Cap
EIVPX16.060.04
+0.25%
Parametric Volatil Risk Prm-Defensv I

CHTH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHTH has been loosely correlated with AOTUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHTH jumps, then AOTUF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHTH
1D Price
Change %
CHTH100%
N/A
AOTUF - CHTH
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MAPIF - CHTH
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
LNSPF - CHTH
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UNBLF - CHTH
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NRWRF - CHTH
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LNSPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNSPF has been loosely correlated with MAPIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LNSPF jumps, then MAPIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LNSPF
1D Price
Change %
LNSPF100%
N/A
MAPIF - LNSPF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CHTH - LNSPF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BTLCY - LNSPF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
UTGPF - LNSPF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CGIUF - LNSPF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More