It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CHT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSGAPY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CHT’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SGAPY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
CHT (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а -1.99% price change this week, while SGAPY (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was -2.65% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was +9.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +63.28%.
CHT is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.
SGAPY is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.
Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.
CHT | SGAPY | CHT / SGAPY | |
Capitalization | 30.6B | 32.8B | 93% |
EBITDA | 87.3B | 5.57B | 1,567% |
Gain YTD | -0.602 | 30.117 | -2% |
P/E Ratio | 26.49 | 19.88 | 133% |
Revenue | 219B | 14.6B | 1,500% |
Total Cash | 43.3B | 1.67B | 2,596% |
Total Debt | 43.8B | 10.9B | 402% |
CHT | SGAPY | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 63 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 48 Fair valued | 43 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 53 | 55 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 71 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 3 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SGAPY's Valuation (43) in the null industry is in the same range as CHT (48) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that SGAPY’s stock grew similarly to CHT’s over the last 12 months.
CHT's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the Major Telecommunications industry is in the same range as SGAPY (55) in the null industry. This means that CHT’s stock grew similarly to SGAPY’s over the last 12 months.
CHT's SMR Rating (71) in the Major Telecommunications industry is in the same range as SGAPY (98) in the null industry. This means that CHT’s stock grew similarly to SGAPY’s over the last 12 months.
SGAPY's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as CHT (54) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that SGAPY’s stock grew similarly to CHT’s over the last 12 months.
SGAPY's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHT (61) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that SGAPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHT’s over the last 12 months.
CHT | SGAPY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago12% | 3 days ago53% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago20% | 3 days ago54% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago21% | 3 days ago65% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago17% | 3 days ago58% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago18% | 3 days ago56% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 8 days ago57% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago56% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago16% | 3 days ago58% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago24% | 3 days ago52% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHT has been loosely correlated with KT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHT jumps, then KT could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that SGAPY and TU have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SGAPY and TU's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SGAPY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SGAPY | 100% | +2.21% | ||
TU - SGAPY | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.57% | ||
RCI - SGAPY | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.53% | ||
CHT - SGAPY | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.61% | ||
TLGPY - SGAPY | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.87% | ||
ATEX - SGAPY | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.47% | ||
More |