CHT
Price
$43.57
Change
+$0.16 (+0.37%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
33.67B
10 days until earnings call
FNGR
Price
$1.52
Change
+$0.03 (+2.01%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
92.58M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHT vs FNGR

Header iconCHT vs FNGR Comparison
Open Charts CHT vs FNGRBanner chart's image
CHUNGHWA TELECOM
Price$43.57
Change+$0.16 (+0.37%)
Volume$101.84K
Capitalization33.67B
FingerMotion
Price$1.52
Change+$0.03 (+2.01%)
Volume$230.36K
Capitalization92.58M
CHT vs FNGR Comparison Chart in %
CHT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNGR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHT vs. FNGR commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHT is a Hold and FNGR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (CHT: $43.57 vs. FNGR: $1.52)
Brand notoriety: CHT and FNGR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHT: 85% vs. FNGR: 83%
Market capitalization -- CHT: $33.67B vs. FNGR: $92.58M
CHT [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $33.67B. FNGR’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $92.58M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $258.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFNGR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CHT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FNGR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CHT is a better buy in the long-term than FNGR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FNGR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FNGR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CHT is a better buy in the short-term than FNGR.

Price Growth

CHT (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а +1.49% price change this week, while FNGR (@Major Telecommunications) price change was -16.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +1.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

CHT is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (+1.34% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHT($33.7B) has a higher market cap than FNGR($92.6M). FNGR YTD gains are higher at: 26.667 vs. CHT (19.990). CHT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 89.6B vs. FNGR (-5.98M). CHT has more cash in the bank: 73.9B vs. FNGR (2.86M). FNGR has less debt than CHT: FNGR (1.23M) vs CHT (43.6B). CHT has higher revenues than FNGR: CHT (232B) vs FNGR (35.7M).
CHTFNGRCHT / FNGR
Capitalization33.7B92.6M36,393%
EBITDA89.6B-5.98M-1,497,222%
Gain YTD19.99026.66775%
P/E Ratio27.36N/A-
Revenue232B35.7M649,860%
Total Cash73.9B2.86M2,581,209%
Total Debt43.6B1.23M3,536,091%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHT vs FNGR: Fundamental Ratings
CHT
FNGR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6220
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
41100
SMR RATING
1..100
6997
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5377
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
40100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CHT's Valuation (51) in the Major Telecommunications industry is in the same range as FNGR (76) in the null industry. This means that CHT’s stock grew similarly to FNGR’s over the last 12 months.

CHT's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the Major Telecommunications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNGR (100) in the null industry. This means that CHT’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNGR’s over the last 12 months.

CHT's SMR Rating (69) in the Major Telecommunications industry is in the same range as FNGR (97) in the null industry. This means that CHT’s stock grew similarly to FNGR’s over the last 12 months.

CHT's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Major Telecommunications industry is in the same range as FNGR (77) in the null industry. This means that CHT’s stock grew similarly to FNGR’s over the last 12 months.

CHT's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the Major Telecommunications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNGR (100) in the null industry. This means that CHT’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNGR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHTFNGR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNGR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MHCUF18.500.01
+0.05%
Flagship Communities Real Estate Investment Trust
CPAMF1.78N/A
N/A
CAPITALAND INTEGRATED COML TR MGMT LTD
HWKE0.11N/A
N/A
Hawkeye Systems, Inc.
JTEKY24.00N/A
N/A
JTEKT Corp.
PGZFF0.12N/A
-1.31%
Pan Global Resource, Inc.

CHT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHT has been loosely correlated with SKM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHT jumps, then SKM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHT
1D Price
Change %
CHT100%
+0.37%
SKM - CHT
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
KT - CHT
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.09%
DTEGY - CHT
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.28%
VOD - CHT
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.66%
TLK - CHT
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
More

FNGR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FNGR and VIV have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNGR and VIV's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNGR
1D Price
Change %
FNGR100%
+2.01%
VIV - FNGR
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.09%
AMX - FNGR
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.44%
TV - FNGR
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.05%
LUMN - FNGR
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.71%
CHT - FNGR
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
More