Advertisement
CHSCL vs SPFF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHSCL is a Hold and SPFF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CHSCL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
- CHSCL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CHSCL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- CHSCL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CHSCL (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) experienced а -0.23% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry was +2.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.00%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Agricultural Commodities/Milling (+2.72% weekly)The Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry includes companies that are involved in farming activities, such as crop production, livestock management and animal feed, for commercial purposes. The industry includes a wide range of operations from growing corn, to grain and oilseed processing to the operation of flour mills. Changes in consumer tastes is one of the critical factors influencing what products are grown and raised in this industry. Potential risks to the business include climate change and fluctuations in global prices of agricultural products. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Elanco Animal Health, Inc., Bunge Limited and Canopy Growth Corporation are some of the biggest U.S. companies operating in this industry.
CHSCL | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 70 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 5 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 45 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CHSCL | SPFF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 13% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 11% | 3 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 4% | 3 days ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 10% | 3 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 10% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 5% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 10% | 11 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 8% | 3 days ago 70% |
Advertisement
CHSCL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHSCL has been loosely correlated with CHSCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHSCL jumps, then CHSCO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHSCL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHSCL | 100% | -0.31% | ||
| CHSCO - CHSCL | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.91% | ||
| CHSCN - CHSCL | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.23% | ||
| CHSCP - CHSCL | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.88% | ||
| CHSCM - CHSCL | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| LND - CHSCL | 25% Poorly correlated | -2.40% | ||
More | ||||
SPFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPFF has been closely correlated with HBANP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SPFF jumps, then HBANP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPFF | 100% | +0.76% | ||
| HBANP - SPFF | 70% Closely correlated | -0.28% | ||
| ACGLN - SPFF | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| HBANL - SPFF | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.08% | ||
| FITBI - SPFF | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.00% | ||
| CHSCL - SPFF | 33% Poorly correlated | -0.08% | ||
More | ||||