Advertisement
CHRUF vs IHS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHRUF is a Hold and IHS is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CHRUF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
- CHRUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IHS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- IHS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CHRUF (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а 0.00% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was +2.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +45.87%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Wireless Telecommunications (+2.01% weekly)Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.
| CHRUF | IHS | CHRUF / IHS | |
| Capitalization | 2.34B | 1.15B | 204% |
| EBITDA | 610M | -998.47M | -61% |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 110.959 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 121.95 | 113.64 | 107% |
| Revenue | 978M | 2.13B | 46% |
| Total Cash | 88M | 294M | 30% |
| Total Debt | 2.51B | 4.11B | 61% |
| CHRUF | IHS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 13% | 3 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 12% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 10 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 85% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| LOVLX | 34.48 | 0.31 | +0.91% |
| Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock F3 | |||
| BVOIX | 12.24 | 0.09 | +0.74% |
| Barrow Hanley US Value Opportunities I | |||
| VDADX | 56.74 | 0.26 | +0.46% |
| Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Adm | |||
| JNOSX | 52.88 | -0.21 | -0.40% |
| Janus Henderson Overseas D | |||
| ZEMAX | 13.27 | -0.08 | -0.60% |
| American Beacon Ninety One Emr Mkts Eq Y | |||
CHRUF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHRUF has been closely correlated with GTMEF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CHRUF jumps, then GTMEF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHRUF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHRUF | 100% | N/A | ||
| GTMEF - CHRUF | 69% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| WOW - CHRUF | 40% Loosely correlated | -5.70% | ||
| IHS - CHRUF | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.65% | ||
| AAFRF - CHRUF | 1% Poorly correlated | +11.96% | ||
| NETLF - CHRUF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
IHS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that IHS and LILA have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IHS and LILA's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IHS | 100% | -0.65% | ||
| LILA - IHS | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.44% | ||
| TDS - IHS | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.28% | ||
| LILAK - IHS | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.58% | ||
| WOW - IHS | 26% Poorly correlated | -5.70% | ||
| USM - IHS | 25% Poorly correlated | +3.41% | ||
More | ||||