Advertisement
CHRHF vs XMTR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHRHF is a Hold and XMTR is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CHRHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileXMTR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CHRHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- XMTR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CHRHF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XMTR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CHRHF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
- XMTR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CHRHF (@Tools & Hardware) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while XMTR (@Industrial Machinery) price change was +0.40% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Tools & Hardware industry was +0.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.29%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.25%.
Reported Earning Dates
XMTR is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Tools & Hardware (+0.03% weekly)Tools & Hardware industry includes companies that manufacture security products, storage cabinets, steel rules and tapes, calipers, shoe hook fasteners, lumber, structural materials and other related supplies. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., Snap-on Incorporated and L.S. Starrett Company are some of the largest, established players in this industry. The industry is also seeing rapid growth in online sales. The proliferation of do-it-yourself (DIY) projects has boosted industry demand. But oil price volatility poses potential risks to this industry, particularly to e-commerce companies which spend on services of shipping companies, which might alter charges based on oil price movements.
@Industrial Machinery (-0.43% weekly)The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
| CHRHF | XMTR | CHRHF / XMTR | |
| Capitalization | 1.39B | 2.52B | 55% |
| EBITDA | N/A | -41.54M | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.828 | 16.456 | 120% |
| P/E Ratio | 9.59 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 604M | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 226M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 335M | - |
| CHRHF | XMTR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 60% | 4 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 22% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 33% | 4 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 40% | 4 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 22% | 4 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 25% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 20 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 25% | 4 days ago 87% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MGIBX | 40.84 | 0.21 | +0.52% |
| MFS International Intrinsic Value B | |||
| ISIIX | 13.19 | 0.05 | +0.38% |
| Voya International Index Port S2 | |||
| MRIMX | 24.71 | 0.04 | +0.16% |
| Victory Integrity Mid-Cap Value R6 | |||
| PAGYX | 22.22 | 0.01 | +0.05% |
| Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Gr Y | |||
| PJDAX | 18.58 | -0.11 | -0.59% |
| PGIM Jennison Rising Dividend A | |||
CHRHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CHRHF and XMTR have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHRHF and XMTR's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHRHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHRHF | 100% | N/A | ||
| XMTR - CHRHF | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.06% | ||
| KRDXF - CHRHF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CR - CHRHF | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.44% | ||
| JCSE - CHRHF | 3% Poorly correlated | +0.47% | ||
| LASE - CHRHF | 2% Poorly correlated | -3.76% | ||
More | ||||
XMTR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XMTR has been loosely correlated with HLIO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if XMTR jumps, then HLIO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XMTR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XMTR | 100% | +1.06% | ||
| HLIO - XMTR | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.89% | ||
| ITT - XMTR | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.59% | ||
| NPO - XMTR | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.17% | ||
| FLS - XMTR | 46% Loosely correlated | +1.19% | ||
| LECO - XMTR | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.14% | ||
More | ||||