Advertisement
CHPT vs TLF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHPT is a Hold and TLF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CHPT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CHPT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CHPT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TLF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CHPT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CHPT (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +16.77% price change this week, while TLF (@Specialty Stores) price change was -1.22% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +0.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.35%.
Reported Earning Dates
CHPT is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2025.
TLF is expected to report earnings on Aug 19, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Specialty Stores (+0.68% weekly)The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
| CHPT | TLF | CHPT / TLF | |
| Capitalization | 259M | 29.6M | 875% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 5.02M | - |
| Gain YTD | -48.271 | 0.423 | -11,417% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 2.32 | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 74.2M | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 23.6M | - |
| Total Debt | 322M | 10.7M | 3,009% |
CHPT | TLF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 98 Overvalued | 36 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 58 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 42 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 90 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TLF's Valuation (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHPT (98). This means that TLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHPT’s over the last 12 months.
TLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHPT (100). This means that TLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHPT’s over the last 12 months.
TLF's SMR Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHPT (99). This means that TLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHPT’s over the last 12 months.
TLF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHPT (90). This means that TLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHPT’s over the last 12 months.
CHPT's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TLF (99). This means that CHPT’s stock grew significantly faster than TLF’s over the last 12 months.
| CHPT | TLF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 52% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 11 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 50% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 54% |
Advertisement
CHPT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHPT has been loosely correlated with BARK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHPT jumps, then BARK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHPT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHPT | 100% | +5.43% | ||
| BARK - CHPT | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.37% | ||
| EVGO - CHPT | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.86% | ||
| EYE - CHPT | 36% Loosely correlated | -6.33% | ||
| FND - CHPT | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.09% | ||
| SVV - CHPT | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.41% | ||
More | ||||
TLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TLF and CHPT have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TLF and CHPT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TLF | 100% | +0.23% | ||
| CHPT - TLF | 15% Poorly correlated | +5.43% | ||
| LESL - TLF | 12% Poorly correlated | -5.32% | ||
| GRWG - TLF | 10% Poorly correlated | +2.94% | ||
| SNROF - TLF | 7% Poorly correlated | +10.61% | ||
| ONEW - TLF | 7% Poorly correlated | -3.24% | ||
More | ||||