CHPT
Price
$0.76
Change
-$0.03 (-3.80%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
799.9M
10 days until earnings call
TLF
Price
$3.86
Change
-$0.12 (-3.02%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
39.06M
10 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CHPT vs TLF

Header iconCHPT vs TLF Comparison
Open Charts CHPT vs TLFBanner chart's image
ChargePoint Holdings
Price$0.76
Change-$0.03 (-3.80%)
Volume$16.93M
Capitalization799.9M
Tandy Leather Factory
Price$3.86
Change-$0.12 (-3.02%)
Volume$29.19K
Capitalization39.06M
CHPT vs TLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CHPT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHPT vs. TLF commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHPT is a Hold and TLF is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (CHPT: $0.76 vs. TLF: $3.86)
Brand notoriety: CHPT and TLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHPT: 61% vs. TLF: 83%
Market capitalization -- CHPT: $799.9M vs. TLF: $39.06M
CHPT [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $799.9M. TLF’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $39.06M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $9.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHPT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CHPT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TLF is a better buy in the long-term than CHPT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHPT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CHPT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

CHPT (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -6.70% price change this week, while TLF (@Specialty Stores) price change was +1.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -3.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

CHPT is expected to report earnings on May 29, 2025.

TLF is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-3.85% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHPT($800M) has a higher market cap than TLF($39.1M). TLF YTD gains are higher at: 11.421 vs. CHPT (-28.963). TLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.04M vs. CHPT (-329.2M). CHPT has more cash in the bank: 233M vs. TLF (12.2M). TLF has less debt than CHPT: TLF (9.43M) vs CHPT (315M). CHPT has higher revenues than TLF: CHPT (559M) vs TLF (76.2M).
CHPTTLFCHPT / TLF
Capitalization800M39.1M2,046%
EBITDA-329.2M9.04M-3,643%
Gain YTD-28.96311.421-254%
P/E RatioN/A10.33-
Revenue559M76.2M734%
Total Cash233M12.2M1,910%
Total Debt315M9.43M3,342%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TLF: Fundamental Ratings
TLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
94
SMR RATING
1..100
85
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHPT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CHPT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL245.55-0.28
-0.11%
Apple
BTC.X96258.000000-319.757800
-0.33%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY599.94-10.44
-1.71%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME26.42-0.62
-2.29%
GameStop Corp
TSLA337.80-16.60
-4.68%
Tesla

CHPT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHPT has been loosely correlated with EVGO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHPT jumps, then EVGO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHPT
1D Price
Change %
CHPT100%
-3.78%
EVGO - CHPT
50%
Loosely correlated
-4.59%
LAD - CHPT
43%
Loosely correlated
-2.93%
FND - CHPT
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.54%
LESL - CHPT
39%
Loosely correlated
-4.05%
EYE - CHPT
37%
Loosely correlated
-5.42%
More

TLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TLF and MNSO have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TLF and MNSO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TLF
1D Price
Change %
TLF100%
-3.02%
MNSO - TLF
10%
Poorly correlated
-11.98%
SNROF - TLF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACVA - TLF
6%
Poorly correlated
-5.41%
ASO - TLF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.30%
CHPT - TLF
3%
Poorly correlated
-3.78%
More