CHPT
Price
$0.62
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
799.9M
36 days until earnings call
TLF
Price
$3.36
Change
+$0.06 (+1.82%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
39.06M
28 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHPT vs TLF

Header iconCHPT vs TLF Comparison
Open Charts CHPT vs TLFBanner chart's image
ChargePoint Holdings
Price$0.62
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$15.53M
Capitalization799.9M
Tandy Leather Factory
Price$3.36
Change+$0.06 (+1.82%)
Volume$15.23K
Capitalization39.06M
CHPT vs TLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CHPT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHPT vs. TLF commentary
Jul 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHPT is a Hold and TLF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 22, 2025
Stock price -- (CHPT: $0.62 vs. TLF: $3.36)
Brand notoriety: CHPT and TLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHPT: 83% vs. TLF: 75%
Market capitalization -- CHPT: $799.9M vs. TLF: $39.06M
CHPT [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $799.9M. TLF’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $39.06M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHPT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CHPT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TLF is a better buy in the long-term than CHPT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHPT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TLF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHPT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TLF is a better buy in the short-term than CHPT.

Price Growth

CHPT (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -3.07% price change this week, while TLF (@Specialty Stores) price change was +0.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -1.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

CHPT is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2025.

TLF is expected to report earnings on Aug 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-1.65% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHPT($800M) has a higher market cap than TLF($39.1M). TLF YTD gains are higher at: -3.012 vs. CHPT (-41.916). TLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.04M vs. CHPT (-329.2M). CHPT has more cash in the bank: 233M vs. TLF (12.2M). TLF has less debt than CHPT: TLF (9.43M) vs CHPT (315M). CHPT has higher revenues than TLF: CHPT (559M) vs TLF (76.2M).
CHPTTLFCHPT / TLF
Capitalization800M39.1M2,046%
EBITDA-329.2M9.04M-3,643%
Gain YTD-41.916-3.0121,392%
P/E RatioN/A10.33-
Revenue559M76.2M734%
Total Cash233M12.2M1,910%
Total Debt315M9.43M3,342%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHPT vs TLF: Fundamental Ratings
CHPT
TLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6150
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10067
SMR RATING
1..100
9941
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6548
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
199
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TLF's Valuation (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHPT (98). This means that TLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHPT’s over the last 12 months.

TLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHPT (100). This means that TLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHPT’s over the last 12 months.

TLF's SMR Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHPT (99). This means that TLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHPT’s over the last 12 months.

TLF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as CHPT (65). This means that TLF’s stock grew similarly to CHPT’s over the last 12 months.

CHPT's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TLF (99). This means that CHPT’s stock grew significantly faster than TLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHPTTLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHPT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GROY2.440.07
+2.95%
Gold Royalty Corp
CRSP65.330.20
+0.31%
CRISPR Therapeutics AG
CI294.80-0.91
-0.31%
Cigna Group (The)
ICHR22.60-0.15
-0.66%
Ichor Holdings
XTIA2.16-0.07
-3.14%
XTI Aerospace Inc

CHPT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHPT has been loosely correlated with BARK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHPT jumps, then BARK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHPT
1D Price
Change %
CHPT100%
-0.03%
BARK - CHPT
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.99%
EVGO - CHPT
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.86%
WSM - CHPT
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.06%
FND - CHPT
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.30%
EYE - CHPT
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.88%
More

TLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TLF and CHPT have been poorly correlated (+19% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TLF and CHPT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TLF
1D Price
Change %
TLF100%
+1.97%
CHPT - TLF
19%
Poorly correlated
-0.03%
LESL - TLF
12%
Poorly correlated
+4.09%
BQ - TLF
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.72%
GRWG - TLF
11%
Poorly correlated
+6.00%
ONEW - TLF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.01%
More