Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CHPS vs SMH
CHPS vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts CHPS vs SMH
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Eq ETF
Price$44.44
Change-$1.46 (-3.18%)
Volume$4.5K
Net Assets14.43M
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$344.82
Change-$10.71 (-3.01%)
Volume$10.65M
Net Assets37.62B
CHPS vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CHPS vs. SMH commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHPS is a Hold and SMH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 37.6B vs. CHPS (14.4M). CHPS has a higher annual dividend yield than SMH: CHPS (53.728) vs SMH (46.810). CHPS was incepted earlier than SMH: CHPS (2 years) vs SMH (14 years). CHPS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than SMH (0.35). CHPS has a higher turnover SMH (15.00) vs SMH (15.00).
| CHPS | SMH | CHPS / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 53.728 | 46.810 | 115% |
| Net Assets | 14.4M | 37.6B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.35 | 43% |
| Turnover | 19.00 | 15.00 | 127% |
| Yield | 0.68 | 0.30 | 232% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CHPS | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 85% | 17 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 76% | 7 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CGBL | 35.04 | 0.09 | +0.26% |
| Capital Group Core Balanced ETF | |||
| CCNR | 32.50 | 0.05 | +0.16% |
| ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF | |||
| XTOC | 33.05 | 0.02 | +0.07% |
| Innovator US Equity Acclrtd Pls ETF™ Oct | |||
| ECOW | 25.57 | 0.01 | +0.03% |
| Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF | |||
| GRPM | 119.07 | -0.12 | -0.10% |
| Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF | |||
CHPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CHPS and ASX have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHPS and ASX's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHPS | 100% | +1.01% | ||
| ASX - CHPS | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.07% | ||
| MRVL - CHPS | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| AMD - CHPS | 7% Poorly correlated | +9.00% | ||
| ENTG - CHPS | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.43% | ||
| FN - CHPS | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.40% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +1.28% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 87% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| NVDA - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | +1.41% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | +0.90% | ||
More | ||||