Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CHPS vs SMH
CHPS vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts CHPS vs SMH
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Eq ETF
Price$34.88
Change+$0.35 (+1.01%)
Volume$100
Net Assets8.09M
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$293.51
Change+$2.39 (+0.82%)
Volume$36.37K
Net Assets27.05B
CHPS vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CHPS vs. SMH commentary
Aug 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHPS is a Hold and SMH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 27B vs. CHPS (8.09M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than CHPS: SMH (20.213) vs CHPS (15.369). CHPS was incepted earlier than SMH: CHPS (2 years) vs SMH (14 years). CHPS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than SMH (0.35). CHPS has a higher turnover SMH (15.00) vs SMH (15.00).
| CHPS | SMH | CHPS / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 15.369 | 20.213 | 76% |
| Net Assets | 8.09M | 27B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.35 | 43% |
| Turnover | 18.00 | 15.00 | 120% |
| Yield | 0.92 | 0.37 | 248% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CHPS | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 75% | 6 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CHPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHPS has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CHPS jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHPS | 100% | +2.52% | ||
| LRCX - CHPS | 83% Closely correlated | +2.62% | ||
| KLAC - CHPS | 82% Closely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| AMAT - CHPS | 81% Closely correlated | +0.94% | ||
| ADI - CHPS | 78% Closely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| MKSI - CHPS | 78% Closely correlated | +0.61% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | N/A | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 89% Closely correlated | +2.62% | ||
| NVDA - SMH | 88% Closely correlated | +1.07% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 87% Closely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 87% Closely correlated | +0.94% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 84% Closely correlated | -0.33% | ||
More | ||||