Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CHPS vs SMH
CHPS vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts CHPS vs SMH
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Eq ETF
Price$53.53
Change+$1.18 (+2.25%)
Volume$2.3K
Net Assets23.32M
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$396.61
Change+$8.26 (+2.13%)
Volume$147.97K
Net Assets41.15B
CHPS vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CHPS vs. SMH commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHPS is a Hold and SMH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 41.1B vs. CHPS (23.3M). CHPS has a higher annual dividend yield than SMH: CHPS (10.854) vs SMH (7.836). CHPS was incepted earlier than SMH: CHPS (3 years) vs SMH (14 years). CHPS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than SMH (0.35). CHPS has a higher turnover SMH (15.00) vs SMH (15.00).
| CHPS | SMH | CHPS / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 10.854 | 7.836 | 139% |
| Net Assets | 23.3M | 41.1B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.35 | 43% |
| Turnover | 19.00 | 15.00 | 127% |
| Yield | 0.70 | 0.31 | 227% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CHPS | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 8 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CHPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CHPS and ASX have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHPS and ASX's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHPS | 100% | -0.31% | ||
| ASX - CHPS | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.96% | ||
| MRVL - CHPS | 7% Poorly correlated | -2.22% | ||
| AMD - CHPS | 7% Poorly correlated | +1.19% | ||
| ENTG - CHPS | 6% Poorly correlated | +1.98% | ||
| FN - CHPS | 5% Poorly correlated | -2.44% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | -0.81% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 87% Closely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| NVDA - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | -1.44% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | -1.24% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | -2.61% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | -0.98% | ||
More | ||||