Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CHPS vs SMH
CHPS vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts CHPS vs SMH
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Eq ETF
Price$44.15
Change+$0.96 (+2.22%)
Volume$226
Net Assets11.84M
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$347.22
Change+$4.39 (+1.28%)
Volume$83.24K
Net Assets33.81B
CHPS vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CHPS vs. SMH commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHPS is a Hold and SMH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 33.8B vs. CHPS (11.8M). CHPS has a higher annual dividend yield than SMH: CHPS (44.650) vs SMH (41.566). CHPS was incepted earlier than SMH: CHPS (2 years) vs SMH (14 years). CHPS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than SMH (0.35). CHPS has a higher turnover SMH (15.00) vs SMH (15.00).
| CHPS | SMH | CHPS / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 44.650 | 41.566 | 107% |
| Net Assets | 11.8M | 33.8B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.35 | 43% |
| Turnover | 19.00 | 15.00 | 127% |
| Yield | 0.80 | 0.33 | 243% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CHPS | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 59% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 76% | 11 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CHPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CHPS and MRVL have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHPS and MRVL's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHPS | 100% | +0.08% | ||
| MRVL - CHPS | 7% Poorly correlated | -0.32% | ||
| ASX - CHPS | 7% Poorly correlated | +1.11% | ||
| AMD - CHPS | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.63% | ||
| NVDA - CHPS | 5% Poorly correlated | +0.78% | ||
| ENTG - CHPS | 5% Poorly correlated | +0.44% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | -0.14% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | -0.60% | ||
| NVDA - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | +0.78% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | +0.72% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 83% Closely correlated | -1.59% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | -1.20% | ||
More | ||||