FN | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 73 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 6 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 49 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 11 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CHPS | FN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 8 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 80% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CHPS and ASX have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHPS and ASX's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHPS | 100% | -0.31% | ||
| ASX - CHPS | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.96% | ||
| MRVL - CHPS | 7% Poorly correlated | -2.22% | ||
| AMD - CHPS | 7% Poorly correlated | +1.19% | ||
| ENTG - CHPS | 6% Poorly correlated | +1.98% | ||
| FN - CHPS | 5% Poorly correlated | -2.44% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FN has been closely correlated with CLS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FN jumps, then CLS could also see price increases.