CHPGF
Price
$1.02
Change
-$0.13 (-11.30%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
86.4M
GSHRF
Price
$0.25
Change
-$0.03 (-10.71%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
20.85M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHPGF vs GSHRF

Header iconCHPGF vs GSHRF Comparison
Open Charts CHPGF vs GSHRFBanner chart's image
Chesapeake Gold
Price$1.02
Change-$0.13 (-11.30%)
Volume$44.05K
Capitalization86.4M
Goldshore Resources
Price$0.25
Change-$0.03 (-10.71%)
Volume$119.6K
Capitalization20.85M
CHPGF vs GSHRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CHPGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSHRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHPGF vs. GSHRF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHPGF is a Hold and GSHRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (CHPGF: $1.02 vs. GSHRF: $0.25)
Brand notoriety: CHPGF and GSHRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHPGF: 167% vs. GSHRF: 156%
Market capitalization -- CHPGF: $86.4M vs. GSHRF: $20.85M
CHPGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $86.4M. GSHRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $20.85M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHPGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGSHRF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CHPGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GSHRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CHPGF and GSHRF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHPGF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GSHRF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHPGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GSHRF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CHPGF and GSHRF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CHPGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -9.69% price change this week, while GSHRF (@Precious Metals) price change was +4.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHPGF($86.4M) has a higher market cap than GSHRF($20.8M). CHPGF YTD gains are higher at: 70.995 vs. GSHRF (51.304). GSHRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.2M vs. CHPGF (-10.49M). CHPGF has more cash in the bank: 25.5M vs. GSHRF (4M). GSHRF has less debt than CHPGF: GSHRF (345K) vs CHPGF (700K). CHPGF (0) and GSHRF (0) have equivalent revenues.
CHPGFGSHRFCHPGF / GSHRF
Capitalization86.4M20.8M415%
EBITDA-10.49M-2.2M476%
Gain YTD70.99551.304138%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash25.5M4M638%
Total Debt700K345K203%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHPGF vs GSHRF: Fundamental Ratings
CHPGF
GSHRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
799
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10085
SMR RATING
1..100
9193
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3841
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CHPGF's Valuation (28) in the null industry is in the same range as GSHRF (38). This means that CHPGF’s stock grew similarly to GSHRF’s over the last 12 months.

GSHRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as CHPGF (100). This means that GSHRF’s stock grew similarly to CHPGF’s over the last 12 months.

CHPGF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as GSHRF (93). This means that CHPGF’s stock grew similarly to GSHRF’s over the last 12 months.

CHPGF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as GSHRF (41). This means that CHPGF’s stock grew similarly to GSHRF’s over the last 12 months.

CHPGF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GSHRF (100). This means that CHPGF’s stock grew similarly to GSHRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHPGFGSHRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHPGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSHRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EMUSF0.090.01
+19.80%
ELECTRIC METALS USA LTD.
CNPPF0.70N/A
N/A
CHINA OVERSEAS PPTY HLDGS LTD
HBGRY0.76N/A
N/A
Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG
SGSOF100.07N/A
N/A
SGS SA
GAMN0.06N/A
N/A
Great American Food Chain, Inc. (The)

CHPGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CHPGF and GSHRF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHPGF and GSHRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHPGF
1D Price
Change %
CHPGF100%
-11.26%
GSHRF - CHPGF
29%
Poorly correlated
-10.28%
WTHVF - CHPGF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.42%
MMNGF - CHPGF
27%
Poorly correlated
-3.45%
RSNVF - CHPGF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.97%
LOMLF - CHPGF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.15%
More

GSHRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GSHRF and CHPGF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GSHRF and CHPGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSHRF
1D Price
Change %
GSHRF100%
-10.28%
CHPGF - GSHRF
29%
Poorly correlated
-11.26%
LGDTF - GSHRF
28%
Poorly correlated
-3.10%
LOMLF - GSHRF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.15%
GSVRF - GSHRF
24%
Poorly correlated
-5.68%
EQMEF - GSHRF
24%
Poorly correlated
-4.36%
More