Advertisement
CHPFF vs SLCJY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHPFF is a Hold and SLCJY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CHPFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSLCJY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CHPFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SLCJY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CHPFF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLCJY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CHPFF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
- SLCJY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CHPFF (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SLCJY (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) price change was +1.60% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry was +0.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.87%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Agricultural Commodities/Milling (+0.17% weekly)The Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry includes companies that are involved in farming activities, such as crop production, livestock management and animal feed, for commercial purposes. The industry includes a wide range of operations from growing corn, to grain and oilseed processing to the operation of flour mills. Changes in consumer tastes is one of the critical factors influencing what products are grown and raised in this industry. Potential risks to the business include climate change and fluctuations in global prices of agricultural products. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Elanco Animal Health, Inc., Bunge Limited and Canopy Growth Corporation are some of the biggest U.S. companies operating in this industry.
| CHPFF | SLCJY | CHPFF / SLCJY | |
| Capitalization | 5.43B | 1.37B | 397% |
| EBITDA | 71.3B | 2.37B | 3,011% |
| Gain YTD | -10.294 | 18.334 | -56% |
| P/E Ratio | 5.18 | 12.49 | 41% |
| Revenue | 583B | 8.79B | 6,636% |
| Total Cash | 33.1B | 1.15B | 2,878% |
| Total Debt | 517B | 10.1B | 5,119% |
CHPFF | SLCJY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 96 | 63 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 7 Undervalued | 25 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 53 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 62 | 64 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 89 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 63 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CHPFF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is in the same range as SLCJY (25). This means that CHPFF’s stock grew similarly to SLCJY’s over the last 12 months.
SLCJY's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHPFF (100). This means that SLCJY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHPFF’s over the last 12 months.
CHPFF's SMR Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as SLCJY (64). This means that CHPFF’s stock grew similarly to SLCJY’s over the last 12 months.
SLCJY's Price Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as CHPFF (89). This means that SLCJY’s stock grew similarly to CHPFF’s over the last 12 months.
SLCJY's P/E Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHPFF (100). This means that SLCJY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHPFF’s over the last 12 months.
| CHPFF | SLCJY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 30% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 31% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 37% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 13 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 75% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EXG | 9.02 | 0.08 | +0.89% |
| Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Diversified Equity Income Fund | |||
| FVC | 36.08 | 0.09 | +0.25% |
| First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Foc 5 | |||
| PSFO | 31.76 | 0.01 | +0.03% |
| Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF | |||
| ALIL | 29.05 | -0.06 | -0.19% |
| Argent Focused Small Cap ETF | |||
| RSPG | 80.42 | -1.14 | -1.40% |
| Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Energy ETF | |||
CHPFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHPFF has been loosely correlated with ASTVF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHPFF jumps, then ASTVF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHPFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHPFF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ASTVF - CHPFF | 36% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| MNHVF - CHPFF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SISI - CHPFF | 21% Poorly correlated | -10.00% | ||
| MRVSY - CHPFF | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| AEPLF - CHPFF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SLCJY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SLCJY and MRVSY have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLCJY and MRVSY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SLCJY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLCJY | 100% | N/A | ||
| MRVSY - SLCJY | 17% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| AGRI - SLCJY | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.93% | ||
| CHPFF - SLCJY | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DOLE - SLCJY | 1% Poorly correlated | +1.28% | ||
| CHYI - SLCJY | -4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||