CHPFF
Price
$0.61
Change
-$0.17 (-21.79%)
Updated
Sep 18 closing price
Capitalization
5.33B
MNHVF
Price
$21.41
Change
-$0.50 (-2.28%)
Updated
Sep 19 closing price
Capitalization
10.96B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHPFF vs MNHVF

Header iconCHPFF vs MNHVF Comparison
Open Charts CHPFF vs MNHVFBanner chart's image
Charoen Pokphand Foods
Price$0.61
Change-$0.17 (-21.79%)
Volume$1.68K
Capitalization5.33B
Mowi ASA
Price$21.41
Change-$0.50 (-2.28%)
Volume$1.24K
Capitalization10.96B
CHPFF vs MNHVF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CHPFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNHVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHPFF vs. MNHVF commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHPFF is a Hold and MNHVF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (CHPFF: $0.61 vs. MNHVF: $21.42)
Brand notoriety: CHPFF and MNHVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHPFF: 86% vs. MNHVF: 33%
Market capitalization -- CHPFF: $5.33B vs. MNHVF: $10.96B
CHPFF [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] is valued at $5.33B. MNHVF’s [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] market capitalization is $10.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] industry ranges from $34.75B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] industry is $2.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHPFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMNHVF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CHPFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MNHVF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MNHVF is a better buy in the long-term than CHPFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHPFF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNHVF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHPFF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MNHVF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CHPFF and MNHVF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CHPFF (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MNHVF (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry was +1.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.49%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Agricultural Commodities/Milling (+1.54% weekly)

The Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry includes companies that are involved in farming activities, such as crop production, livestock management and animal feed, for commercial purposes. The industry includes a wide range of operations from growing corn, to grain and oilseed processing to the operation of flour mills. Changes in consumer tastes is one of the critical factors influencing what products are grown and raised in this industry. Potential risks to the business include climate change and fluctuations in global prices of agricultural products. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Elanco Animal Health, Inc., Bunge Limited and Canopy Growth Corporation are some of the biggest U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MNHVF($11B) has a higher market cap than CHPFF($5.33B). MNHVF has higher P/E ratio than CHPFF: MNHVF (28.05) vs CHPFF (5.15). MNHVF YTD gains are higher at: 17.124 vs. CHPFF (-10.294). CHPFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 71.3B vs. MNHVF (1.02B). CHPFF has more cash in the bank: 33.1B vs. MNHVF (227M). MNHVF has less debt than CHPFF: MNHVF (2.66B) vs CHPFF (517B). CHPFF has higher revenues than MNHVF: CHPFF (583B) vs MNHVF (5.65B).
CHPFFMNHVFCHPFF / MNHVF
Capitalization5.33B11B48%
EBITDA71.3B1.02B7,018%
Gain YTD-10.29417.124-60%
P/E Ratio5.1528.0518%
Revenue583B5.65B10,319%
Total Cash33.1B227M14,581%
Total Debt517B2.66B19,473%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHPFF vs MNHVF: Fundamental Ratings
CHPFF
MNHVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10094
SMR RATING
1..100
6274
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8947
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10011
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CHPFF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is in the same range as MNHVF (29). This means that CHPFF’s stock grew similarly to MNHVF’s over the last 12 months.

MNHVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as CHPFF (100). This means that MNHVF’s stock grew similarly to CHPFF’s over the last 12 months.

CHPFF's SMR Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as MNHVF (74). This means that CHPFF’s stock grew similarly to MNHVF’s over the last 12 months.

MNHVF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHPFF (89). This means that MNHVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHPFF’s over the last 12 months.

MNHVF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CHPFF (100). This means that MNHVF’s stock grew significantly faster than CHPFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHPFFMNHVF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
30%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
31%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHPFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNHVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AWI193.981.81
+0.94%
Armstrong World Industries
WVVIP3.20N/A
+0.07%
Willamette Valley Vineyards
INUV3.94-0.02
-0.51%
Inuvo
DAC91.95-1.00
-1.08%
Danaos Corp
OMI4.77-0.07
-1.45%
Owens & Minor

CHPFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHPFF has been loosely correlated with ASTVF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHPFF jumps, then ASTVF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHPFF
1D Price
Change %
CHPFF100%
N/A
ASTVF - CHPFF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MNHVF - CHPFF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SISI - CHPFF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.99%
MRVSY - CHPFF
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.05%
AEPLF - CHPFF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MNHVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNHVF and AGRI have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNHVF and AGRI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNHVF
1D Price
Change %
MNHVF100%
N/A
AGRI - MNHVF
25%
Poorly correlated
-4.86%
SISI - MNHVF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.99%
CHPFF - MNHVF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DTCK - MNHVF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.80%
SALRY - MNHVF
13%
Poorly correlated
-2.01%
More