CHOLF
Price
$0.86
Change
-$0.06 (-6.52%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
8.65B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HNTIF
Price
$4.62
Change
+$0.15 (+3.36%)
Updated
Oct 1 closing price
Capitalization
901.94M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHOLF vs HNTIF

Header iconCHOLF vs HNTIF Comparison
Open Charts CHOLF vs HNTIFBanner chart's image
China Oilfield Services
Price$0.86
Change-$0.06 (-6.52%)
Volume$498
Capitalization8.65B
Hunting Group
Price$4.62
Change+$0.15 (+3.36%)
Volume$200
Capitalization901.94M
CHOLF vs HNTIF Comparison Chart in %
CHOLF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HNTIF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHOLF vs. HNTIF commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHOLF is a Hold and HNTIF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (CHOLF: $0.98 vs. HNTIF: $5.40)
Brand notoriety: CHOLF and HNTIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHOLF: 106% vs. HNTIF: 79%
Market capitalization -- CHOLF: $8.65B vs. HNTIF: $901.94M
CHOLF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $8.65B. HNTIF’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $901.94M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $74.41B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $4.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHOLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHNTIF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CHOLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HNTIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HNTIF is a better buy in the long-term than CHOLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHOLF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HNTIF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHOLF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • HNTIF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HNTIF is a better buy in the short-term than CHOLF.

Price Growth

CHOLF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HNTIF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +1.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.43%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+1.60% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHOLF($8.65B) has a higher market cap than HNTIF($902M). CHOLF has higher P/E ratio than HNTIF: CHOLF (8.35) vs HNTIF (4.92). HNTIF YTD gains are higher at: 11.801 vs. CHOLF (0.000). CHOLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.81B vs. HNTIF (7.4M). CHOLF has more cash in the bank: 6.86B vs. HNTIF (78.1M). HNTIF has less debt than CHOLF: HNTIF (136M) vs CHOLF (17.4B). CHOLF has higher revenues than HNTIF: CHOLF (49.5B) vs HNTIF (1.08B).
CHOLFHNTIFCHOLF / HNTIF
Capitalization8.65B902M959%
EBITDA5.81B7.4M78,486%
Gain YTD0.00011.801-
P/E Ratio8.354.92170%
Revenue49.5B1.08B4,566%
Total Cash6.86B78.1M8,778%
Total Debt17.4B136M12,794%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHOLF vs HNTIF: Fundamental Ratings
CHOLF
HNTIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4148
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10039
SMR RATING
1..100
7492
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5045
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6863
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CHOLF's Valuation (27) in the null industry is in the same range as HNTIF (35). This means that CHOLF’s stock grew similarly to HNTIF’s over the last 12 months.

HNTIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHOLF (100). This means that HNTIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHOLF’s over the last 12 months.

CHOLF's SMR Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as HNTIF (92). This means that CHOLF’s stock grew similarly to HNTIF’s over the last 12 months.

HNTIF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as CHOLF (50). This means that HNTIF’s stock grew similarly to CHOLF’s over the last 12 months.

HNTIF's P/E Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as CHOLF (68). This means that HNTIF’s stock grew similarly to CHOLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHOLFHNTIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHOLF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HNTIF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LMASX34.940.19
+0.55%
ClearBridge Small Cap C
PQIZX14.890.06
+0.40%
PIMCO Dividend and Income A
MCBAX14.210.02
+0.14%
BlackRock Large Cap Focus Value Inv C
PEUCX41.050.03
+0.07%
Principal Equity Income C
MSGQX11.16-0.39
-3.38%
Morgan Stanley Inst Global Stars C

CHOLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CHOLF and HGHAF have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHOLF and HGHAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHOLF
1D Price
Change %
CHOLF100%
N/A
HGHAF - CHOLF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AKKVF - CHOLF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AKRYY - CHOLF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HNTIF - CHOLF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GZPZF - CHOLF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HNTIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HNTIF and CESDF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HNTIF and CESDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HNTIF
1D Price
Change %
HNTIF100%
N/A
CESDF - HNTIF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.67%
PDER - HNTIF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HGHAF - HNTIF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KEGX - HNTIF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
POFCF - HNTIF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More