CHLLF
Price
$3.27
Change
-$0.21 (-6.03%)
Updated
Jun 9 closing price
Capitalization
5.44B
NBIS
Price
$65.47
Change
+$0.56 (+0.86%)
Updated
Sep 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
15.49B
55 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHLLF vs NBIS

Header iconCHLLF vs NBIS Comparison
Open Charts CHLLF vs NBISBanner chart's image
China Literature
Price$3.27
Change-$0.21 (-6.03%)
Volume$900
Capitalization5.44B
Nebius Group
Price$65.47
Change+$0.56 (+0.86%)
Volume$38.56K
Capitalization15.49B
CHLLF vs NBIS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CHLLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NBIS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHLLF vs. NBIS commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHLLF is a Hold and NBIS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CHLLF: $3.27 vs. NBIS: $64.91)
Brand notoriety: CHLLF: Not notable vs. NBIS: Notable
Both companies represent the Internet Software/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHLLF: 100% vs. NBIS: 46%
Market capitalization -- CHLLF: $5.47B vs. NBIS: $15.49B
CHLLF [@Internet Software/Services] is valued at $5.47B. NBIS’s [@Internet Software/Services] market capitalization is $15.49B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Software/Services] industry ranges from $2.81T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Software/Services] industry is $79.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHLLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNBIS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CHLLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NBIS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NBIS is a better buy in the long-term than CHLLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHLLF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NBIS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHLLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • NBIS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CHLLF is a better buy in the short-term than NBIS.

Price Growth

CHLLF (@Internet Software/Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NBIS (@Internet Software/Services) price change was -9.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was +0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

NBIS is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Software/Services (+0.62% weekly)

Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NBIS($15.5B) has a higher market cap than CHLLF($5.44B). CHLLF has higher P/E ratio than NBIS: CHLLF (179.67) vs NBIS (72.17). NBIS YTD gains are higher at: 134.332 vs. CHLLF (-7.462).
CHLLFNBISCHLLF / NBIS
Capitalization5.44B15.5B35%
EBITDAN/A331M-
Gain YTD-7.462134.332-6%
P/E Ratio179.6772.17249%
RevenueN/A249M-
Total CashN/A1.68B-
Total DebtN/A1.19B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHLLF vs NBIS: Fundamental Ratings
CHLLF
NBIS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4285
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10077
SMR RATING
1..100
8383
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7535
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
28
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NBIS's Valuation (77) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as CHLLF (81) in the null industry. This means that NBIS’s stock grew similarly to CHLLF’s over the last 12 months.

NBIS's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as CHLLF (100) in the null industry. This means that NBIS’s stock grew similarly to CHLLF’s over the last 12 months.

NBIS's SMR Rating (83) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as CHLLF (83) in the null industry. This means that NBIS’s stock grew similarly to CHLLF’s over the last 12 months.

NBIS's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHLLF (75) in the null industry. This means that NBIS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHLLF’s over the last 12 months.

CHLLF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as NBIS (8) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that CHLLF’s stock grew similarly to NBIS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHLLFNBIS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHLLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NBIS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UWM44.501.05
+2.42%
ProShares Ultra Russell2000
QQMG39.340.38
+0.97%
Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF
FLJP33.930.27
+0.80%
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF
PALD23.42-0.13
-0.54%
Direxion Daily PANW Bear 1X Shares
CANE10.58-0.19
-1.74%
Teucrium Sugar Fund

CHLLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHLLF has been closely correlated with NBIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CHLLF jumps, then NBIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHLLF
1D Price
Change %
CHLLF100%
N/A
NBIS - CHLLF
73%
Closely correlated
-1.13%
GRPN - CHLLF
42%
Loosely correlated
-4.82%
GITS - CHLLF
39%
Loosely correlated
-3.69%
UPXI - CHLLF
24%
Poorly correlated
-4.52%
FVRR - CHLLF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NBIS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NBIS has been closely correlated with CHLLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NBIS jumps, then CHLLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NBIS
1D Price
Change %
NBIS100%
-1.13%
CHLLF - NBIS
73%
Closely correlated
N/A
OPRA - NBIS
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
META - NBIS
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.57%
PINS - NBIS
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GOOGL - NBIS
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.71%
More