CHLLF
Price
$3.27
Change
-$0.21 (-6.03%)
Updated
Jun 9 closing price
Capitalization
4.6B
KKKUF
Price
$18.05
Change
-$0.17 (-0.93%)
Updated
Jun 10 closing price
Capitalization
3.03B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHLLF vs KKKUF

Header iconCHLLF vs KKKUF Comparison
Open Charts CHLLF vs KKKUFBanner chart's image
China Literature
Price$3.27
Change-$0.21 (-6.03%)
Volume$900
Capitalization4.6B
Kakaku.com
Price$18.05
Change-$0.17 (-0.93%)
Volume$277
Capitalization3.03B
CHLLF vs KKKUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CHLLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KKKUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHLLF vs. KKKUF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHLLF is a Hold and KKKUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (CHLLF: $3.27 vs. KKKUF: $18.05)
Brand notoriety: CHLLF and KKKUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Internet Software/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHLLF: 148% vs. KKKUF: 101%
Market capitalization -- CHLLF: $4.6B vs. KKKUF: $3.03B
CHLLF [@Internet Software/Services] is valued at $4.6B. KKKUF’s [@Internet Software/Services] market capitalization is $3.03B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Software/Services] industry ranges from $1.94T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Software/Services] industry is $69.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHLLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKKKUF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CHLLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • KKKUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, KKKUF is a better buy in the long-term than CHLLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHLLF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KKKUF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHLLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • KKKUF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CHLLF is a better buy in the short-term than KKKUF.

Price Growth

CHLLF (@Internet Software/Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while KKKUF (@Internet Software/Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was +3.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.90%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Software/Services (+3.09% weekly)

Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHLLF($4.6B) has a higher market cap than KKKUF($3.03B). CHLLF has higher P/E ratio than KKKUF: CHLLF (48.08) vs KKKUF (26.88). KKKUF YTD gains are higher at: 12.789 vs. CHLLF (-7.462). KKKUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 27.3B vs. CHLLF (1.34B). KKKUF has more cash in the bank: 37B vs. CHLLF (7.16B). CHLLF has less debt than KKKUF: CHLLF (843M) vs KKKUF (5.96B). KKKUF has higher revenues than CHLLF: KKKUF (60.8B) vs CHLLF (8.41B).
CHLLFKKKUFCHLLF / KKKUF
Capitalization4.6B3.03B152%
EBITDA1.34B27.3B5%
Gain YTD-7.46212.789-58%
P/E Ratio48.0826.88179%
Revenue8.41B60.8B14%
Total Cash7.16B37B19%
Total Debt843M5.96B14%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHLLF vs KKKUF: Fundamental Ratings
CHLLF
KKKUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8115
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7744
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6238
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a1

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KKKUF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHLLF (51). This means that KKKUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHLLF’s over the last 12 months.

KKKUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CHLLF (100). This means that KKKUF’s stock grew similarly to CHLLF’s over the last 12 months.

KKKUF's SMR Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CHLLF (81). This means that KKKUF’s stock grew significantly faster than CHLLF’s over the last 12 months.

KKKUF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHLLF (77). This means that KKKUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHLLF’s over the last 12 months.

KKKUF's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as CHLLF (62). This means that KKKUF’s stock grew similarly to CHLLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHLLFKKKUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
35%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
26%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
26%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHLLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KKKUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PEJ56.750.68
+1.21%
Invesco Dynamic Leisure and Entmnt ETF
BAMD30.650.05
+0.18%
Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF
QMMY23.410.02
+0.09%
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Mod Buffr ETF - May
JANH25.010.01
+0.04%
Innovator Premium Income 20 Bar ETF -Jan
OUNZ31.52-0.58
-1.81%
VanEck Merk Gold Trust

CHLLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHLLF has been closely correlated with NBIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CHLLF jumps, then NBIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHLLF
1D Price
Change %
CHLLF100%
N/A
NBIS - CHLLF
73%
Closely correlated
-1.44%
GRPN - CHLLF
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.59%
GITS - CHLLF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
UPXI - CHLLF
24%
Poorly correlated
-18.20%
FVRR - CHLLF
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.85%
More

KKKUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KKKUF and ZMDTF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KKKUF and ZMDTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KKKUF
1D Price
Change %
KKKUF100%
N/A
ZMDTF - KKKUF
21%
Poorly correlated
+7.45%
MRPT - KKKUF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTTMF - KKKUF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LKST - KKKUF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHLLF - KKKUF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More