Advertisement
CHLLF vs GRPN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHLLF is a Hold and GRPN is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CHLLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGRPN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CHLLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- GRPN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CHLLF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GRPN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CHLLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
- GRPN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CHLLF (@Internet Software/Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GRPN (@Internet Software/Services) price change was -3.57% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was +2.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.75%.
Reported Earning Dates
GRPN is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Internet Software/Services (+2.98% weekly)Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.
| CHLLF | GRPN | CHLLF / GRPN | |
| Capitalization | 4.6B | 495M | 929% |
| EBITDA | 1.34B | 23.5M | 5,715% |
| Gain YTD | -7.462 | 166.914 | -4% |
| P/E Ratio | 48.08 | 6.19 | 777% |
| Revenue | 8.41B | 515M | 1,634% |
| Total Cash | 7.16B | 142M | 5,039% |
| Total Debt | 843M | 279M | 302% |
CHLLF | GRPN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 50 Fair valued | 91 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 69 | 83 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 81 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | 36 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 28 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CHLLF's Valuation (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GRPN (91) in the Advertising Or Marketing Services industry. This means that CHLLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GRPN’s over the last 12 months.
CHLLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as GRPN (83) in the Advertising Or Marketing Services industry. This means that CHLLF’s stock grew similarly to GRPN’s over the last 12 months.
CHLLF's SMR Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as GRPN (98) in the Advertising Or Marketing Services industry. This means that CHLLF’s stock grew similarly to GRPN’s over the last 12 months.
GRPN's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Advertising Or Marketing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHLLF (76) in the null industry. This means that GRPN’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHLLF’s over the last 12 months.
GRPN's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Advertising Or Marketing Services industry is in the same range as CHLLF (59) in the null industry. This means that GRPN’s stock grew similarly to CHLLF’s over the last 12 months.
| CHLLF | GRPN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 30% | 4 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 17% | 4 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 19% | 4 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 20% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 8% | 4 days ago 79% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| LABD | 6.52 | 0.38 | +6.19% |
| Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3X ETF | |||
| AGGH | 20.27 | 0.25 | +1.25% |
| Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF | |||
| FLQL | 63.90 | 0.05 | +0.08% |
| Franklin US Large Cap Mltfctr Idx ETF | |||
| MNTL | 23.21 | N/A | N/A |
| Tema Neuroscience and Mental Health ETF | |||
| LIAK | 194.65 | N/A | N/A |
| LifeX 2054 Infl-Prt Longevity Inc ETF | |||
CHLLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHLLF has been closely correlated with NBIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CHLLF jumps, then NBIS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHLLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHLLF | 100% | N/A | ||
| NBIS - CHLLF | 73% Closely correlated | -1.68% | ||
| GRPN - CHLLF | 42% Loosely correlated | -3.17% | ||
| GITS - CHLLF | 39% Loosely correlated | -5.48% | ||
| UPXI - CHLLF | 24% Poorly correlated | +3.31% | ||
| FVRR - CHLLF | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.43% | ||
More | ||||
GRPN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GRPN has been loosely correlated with CHLLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GRPN jumps, then CHLLF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GRPN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRPN | 100% | -3.17% | ||
| CHLLF - GRPN | 42% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| LKST - GRPN | 39% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| TBLA - GRPN | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.12% | ||
| PINS - GRPN | 31% Poorly correlated | +2.85% | ||
| RTMVF - GRPN | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||