CHLLF
Price
$3.27
Change
-$0.21 (-6.03%)
Updated
Jun 9 closing price
Capitalization
4.6B
FVRR
Price
$28.64
Change
-$0.54 (-1.85%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
805.39M
32 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHLLF vs FVRR

Header iconCHLLF vs FVRR Comparison
Open Charts CHLLF vs FVRRBanner chart's image
China Literature
Price$3.27
Change-$0.21 (-6.03%)
Volume$900
Capitalization4.6B
Fiverr International
Price$28.64
Change-$0.54 (-1.85%)
Volume$567.79K
Capitalization805.39M
CHLLF vs FVRR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CHLLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FVRR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHLLF vs. FVRR commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHLLF is a Hold and FVRR is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (CHLLF: $3.27 vs. FVRR: $28.64)
Brand notoriety: CHLLF and FVRR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Internet Software/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHLLF: 148% vs. FVRR: 109%
Market capitalization -- CHLLF: $4.6B vs. FVRR: $805.39M
CHLLF [@Internet Software/Services] is valued at $4.6B. FVRR’s [@Internet Software/Services] market capitalization is $805.39M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Software/Services] industry ranges from $1.94T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Software/Services] industry is $69.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHLLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFVRR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CHLLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FVRR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CHLLF and FVRR are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHLLF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FVRR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHLLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • FVRR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CHLLF is a better buy in the short-term than FVRR.

Price Growth

CHLLF (@Internet Software/Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FVRR (@Internet Software/Services) price change was -1.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was +3.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

FVRR is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Software/Services (+3.72% weekly)

Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHLLF($4.6B) has a higher market cap than FVRR($805M). FVRR has higher P/E ratio than CHLLF: FVRR (231.22) vs CHLLF (48.08). CHLLF YTD gains are higher at: -7.462 vs. FVRR (-9.738). CHLLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.34B vs. FVRR (13.6M). CHLLF has more cash in the bank: 7.16B vs. FVRR (417M). FVRR has less debt than CHLLF: FVRR (462M) vs CHLLF (843M). CHLLF has higher revenues than FVRR: CHLLF (8.41B) vs FVRR (361M).
CHLLFFVRRCHLLF / FVRR
Capitalization4.6B805M571%
EBITDA1.34B13.6M9,875%
Gain YTD-7.462-9.73877%
P/E Ratio48.08231.2221%
Revenue8.41B361M2,330%
Total Cash7.16B417M1,716%
Total Debt843M462M182%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHLLF vs FVRR: Fundamental Ratings
CHLLF
FVRR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5058
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8184
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7758
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6293
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CHLLF's Valuation (51) in the null industry is in the same range as FVRR (63). This means that CHLLF’s stock grew similarly to FVRR’s over the last 12 months.

CHLLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FVRR (100). This means that CHLLF’s stock grew similarly to FVRR’s over the last 12 months.

CHLLF's SMR Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as FVRR (84). This means that CHLLF’s stock grew similarly to FVRR’s over the last 12 months.

FVRR's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as CHLLF (77). This means that FVRR’s stock grew similarly to CHLLF’s over the last 12 months.

CHLLF's P/E Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as FVRR (93). This means that CHLLF’s stock grew similarly to FVRR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHLLFFVRR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHLLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FVRR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IWL152.320.83
+0.55%
iShares Russell Top 200 ETF
NAN11.370.03
+0.26%
Nuveen New York Quality Municipal Income Fund
BAMD30.650.05
+0.18%
Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF
PEX27.67-0.07
-0.23%
ProShares Global Listed Private Equity
BTCI59.14-0.44
-0.75%
NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF

CHLLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHLLF has been closely correlated with NBIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CHLLF jumps, then NBIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHLLF
1D Price
Change %
CHLLF100%
N/A
NBIS - CHLLF
73%
Closely correlated
-1.44%
GRPN - CHLLF
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.59%
GITS - CHLLF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
UPXI - CHLLF
24%
Poorly correlated
-18.20%
FVRR - CHLLF
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.85%
More

FVRR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FVRR has been loosely correlated with NRDS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FVRR jumps, then NRDS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FVRR
1D Price
Change %
FVRR100%
-1.85%
NRDS - FVRR
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.18%
RDDT - FVRR
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.65%
SNAP - FVRR
39%
Loosely correlated
+7.13%
DASH - FVRR
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.12%
YELP - FVRR
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.59%
More