It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CHKP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileROWKF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CHKP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
CHKP (@Packaged Software) experienced а +0.38% price change this week, while ROWKF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.47%.
CHKP is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
CHKP | ROWKF | CHKP / ROWKF | |
Capitalization | 19.2B | 6.17M | 311,183% |
EBITDA | 939M | -792.15K | -118,538% |
Gain YTD | 16.205 | 100.000 | 16% |
P/E Ratio | 23.14 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 2.39B | 5.74M | 41,630% |
Total Cash | 1.46B | 1.15M | 126,499% |
Total Debt | N/A | 35.3K | - |
CHKP | ROWKF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 41 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 67 Overvalued | 100 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 34 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 78 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CHKP's Valuation (67) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ROWKF (100) in the null industry. This means that CHKP’s stock grew somewhat faster than ROWKF’s over the last 12 months.
CHKP's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for ROWKF (100) in the null industry. This means that CHKP’s stock grew significantly faster than ROWKF’s over the last 12 months.
CHKP's SMR Rating (34) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for ROWKF (100) in the null industry. This means that CHKP’s stock grew significantly faster than ROWKF’s over the last 12 months.
ROWKF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as CHKP (57) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that ROWKF’s stock grew similarly to CHKP’s over the last 12 months.
CHKP's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ROWKF (78) in the null industry. This means that CHKP’s stock grew somewhat faster than ROWKF’s over the last 12 months.
CHKP | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago47% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago43% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago60% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago41% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago0% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago44% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago31% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CHKP and PANW have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHKP and PANW's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHKP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CHKP | 100% | +0.19% | ||
PANW - CHKP | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.98% | ||
AGYS - CHKP | 30% Poorly correlated | -3.34% | ||
CYBR - CHKP | 28% Poorly correlated | +3.32% | ||
DT - CHKP | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.43% | ||
QLYS - CHKP | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.31% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ROWKF has been loosely correlated with KGDEF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ROWKF jumps, then KGDEF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ROWKF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ROWKF | 100% | N/A | ||
KGDEF - ROWKF | 51% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
CHKP - ROWKF | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.19% | ||
BNZI - ROWKF | 23% Poorly correlated | +10.86% | ||
AIFS - ROWKF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
NTCT - ROWKF | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.45% | ||
More |