It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CHKP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFFPP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CHKP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FFPP’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
CHKP (@Computer Communications) experienced а -3.20% price change this week, while FFPP (@Computer Communications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +65.83%.
CHKP is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.
Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
CHKP | FFPP | CHKP / FFPP | |
Capitalization | 20.8B | 173M | 12,023% |
EBITDA | 1.06B | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 3.924 | 562.500 | 1% |
P/E Ratio | 25.30 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 2.64B | N/A | - |
Total Cash | 1.52B | N/A | - |
Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
CHKP | FFPP | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 78 | 45 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 73 Overvalued | 28 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 33 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 32 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FFPP's Valuation (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHKP (73) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that FFPP’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHKP’s over the last 12 months.
CHKP's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for FFPP (100) in the null industry. This means that CHKP’s stock grew significantly faster than FFPP’s over the last 12 months.
CHKP's SMR Rating (32) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for FFPP (100) in the null industry. This means that CHKP’s stock grew significantly faster than FFPP’s over the last 12 months.
FFPP's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHKP (76) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that FFPP’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHKP’s over the last 12 months.
CHKP's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFPP (100) in the null industry. This means that CHKP’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFPP’s over the last 12 months.
CHKP | FFPP | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago50% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago58% | 3 days ago76% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago46% | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago42% | 3 days ago70% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago41% | 3 days ago64% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago40% | 3 days ago67% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago56% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago42% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago63% | 3 days ago83% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago58% | 3 days ago71% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
HELO | 64.86 | 0.06 | +0.09% |
JPMorgan Hedged Equity Ldrd Ovrly ETF | |||
CPRJ | 26.50 | N/A | N/A |
Calamos Russell 2000 Str Alt Prt ETF-Jul | |||
DVND | 33.94 | N/A | N/A |
Touchstone Dividend Select ETF | |||
GCC | 21.60 | -0.11 | -0.53% |
WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Stgy Fd | |||
BOIL | 25.87 | -0.90 | -3.36% |
ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHKP has been loosely correlated with PANW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHKP jumps, then PANW could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHKP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CHKP | 100% | -0.42% | ||
PANW - CHKP | 44% Loosely correlated | -2.68% | ||
EEFT - CHKP | 38% Loosely correlated | +5.64% | ||
CLSK - CHKP | 37% Loosely correlated | +9.63% | ||
FTNT - CHKP | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.33% | ||
ADSK - CHKP | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.45% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that FFPP and EVTC have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FFPP and EVTC's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFPP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FFPP | 100% | N/A | ||
EVTC - FFPP | 26% Poorly correlated | +2.40% | ||
DFDV - FFPP | 22% Poorly correlated | -2.54% | ||
IMXI - FFPP | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.90% | ||
CHKP - FFPP | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.42% | ||
PAYS - FFPP | 22% Poorly correlated | +2.74% | ||
More |