CHKP vs CINT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHKP is a Hold and CINT is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CHKP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCINT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CHKP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- CINT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CHKP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CINT’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CHKP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- CINT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
CHKP (@Packaged Software) experienced а +0.38% price change this week, while CINT (@Packaged Software) price change was +0.87% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.47%.
Reported Earning Dates
CHKP is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-1.65% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| CHKP | CINT | CHKP / CINT | |
| Capitalization | 19.2B | 583M | 3,293% |
| EBITDA | 939M | 409M | 230% |
| Gain YTD | 16.205 | 32.319 | 50% |
| P/E Ratio | 23.14 | 22.92 | 101% |
| Revenue | 2.39B | 2.32B | 103% |
| Total Cash | 1.46B | 233M | 625% |
| Total Debt | N/A | 894M | - |
CHKP | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 67 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 16 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 34 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CHKP | CINT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 0% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 44% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 31% | 2 days ago 77% |
CHKP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CHKP and PANW have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHKP and PANW's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHKP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHKP | 100% | +0.19% | ||
| PANW - CHKP | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.98% | ||
| AGYS - CHKP | 30% Poorly correlated | -3.34% | ||
| CYBR - CHKP | 28% Poorly correlated | +3.32% | ||
| DT - CHKP | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.43% | ||
| QLYS - CHKP | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.31% | ||
More | ||||
CINT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CINT and NATL have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CINT and NATL's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CINT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CINT | 100% | +0.87% | ||
| NATL - CINT | 25% Poorly correlated | -3.39% | ||
| SPMYY - CINT | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CVOSF - CINT | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.59% | ||
| MKTDF - CINT | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CHKP - CINT | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.19% | ||
More | ||||