CHKIF
Price
$0.53
Change
+$0.14 (+35.90%)
Updated
Sep 30 closing price
Capitalization
18.47B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CPCAY
Price
$7.99
Change
+$1.15 (+16.81%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
10.22B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHKIF vs CPCAY

Header iconCHKIF vs CPCAY Comparison
Open Charts CHKIF vs CPCAYBanner chart's image
China Southern Airlines
Price$0.53
Change+$0.14 (+35.90%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization18.47B
Cathay Pacific Airways
Price$7.99
Change+$1.15 (+16.81%)
Volume$624
Capitalization10.22B
CHKIF vs CPCAY Comparison Chart in %
CHKIF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CPCAY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHKIF vs. CPCAY commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHKIF is a Hold and CPCAY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (CHKIF: $0.76 vs. CPCAY: $7.99)
Brand notoriety: CHKIF and CPCAY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Airlines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHKIF: 4% vs. CPCAY: 17%
Market capitalization -- CHKIF: $18.47B vs. CPCAY: $10.22B
CHKIF [@Airlines] is valued at $18.47B. CPCAY’s [@Airlines] market capitalization is $10.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Airlines] industry ranges from $1.51T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Airlines] industry is $35.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHKIF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCPCAY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CHKIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CPCAY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CPCAY is a better buy in the long-term than CHKIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHKIF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CPCAY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHKIF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CPCAY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CPCAY is a better buy in the short-term than CHKIF.

Price Growth

CHKIF (@Airlines) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CPCAY (@Airlines) price change was +1.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Airlines industry was +2.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +48.43%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Airlines (+2.50% weekly)

Airlines industry comprises passenger air transportation, including scheduled and non-scheduled routes. This can include charter airlines, as well as regular commuter ones. Discount pricing and the rise of low-cost carriers over recent decades have expanded the industry by making its services accessible to a much larger global population, compared to the older days when airline travel was a relative luxury for many people in the world. Delta Air Lines Inc., Southwest Airlines Co and United Continental Holdings, Inc. are some of the airlines with the largest stock market capitalizations in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHKIF($18.5B) has a higher market cap than CPCAY($10.2B). CHKIF YTD gains are higher at: 1.672 vs. CPCAY (0.757). CPCAY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 14.9B vs. CHKIF (4.84B). CHKIF has more cash in the bank: 19.5B vs. CPCAY (8.91B). CPCAY has less debt than CHKIF: CPCAY (65.3B) vs CHKIF (210B). CHKIF has higher revenues than CPCAY: CHKIF (177B) vs CPCAY (109B).
CHKIFCPCAYCHKIF / CPCAY
Capitalization18.5B10.2B181%
EBITDA4.84B14.9B32%
Gain YTD1.6720.757221%
P/E RatioN/A8.85-
Revenue177B109B162%
Total Cash19.5B8.91B219%
Total Debt210B65.3B322%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHKIF vs CPCAY: Fundamental Ratings
CHKIF
CPCAY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4877
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7612
SMR RATING
1..100
91100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3952
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8152
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CPCAY's Valuation (25) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHKIF (76). This means that CPCAY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHKIF’s over the last 12 months.

CPCAY's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHKIF (76). This means that CPCAY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHKIF’s over the last 12 months.

CHKIF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as CPCAY (100). This means that CHKIF’s stock grew similarly to CPCAY’s over the last 12 months.

CHKIF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as CPCAY (52). This means that CHKIF’s stock grew similarly to CPCAY’s over the last 12 months.

CPCAY's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as CHKIF (81). This means that CPCAY’s stock grew similarly to CHKIF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHKIFCPCAY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHKIF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CPCAY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PSCW28.090.07
+0.25%
Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETF
RMM14.310.03
+0.21%
RiverNorth Managed Duration Municipal Income Fund
MULT25.380.01
+0.04%
Franklin Multisector Income ETF
SYFI35.92N/A
N/A
AB Short Duration High Yield ETF
EUSA105.47-0.47
-0.44%
iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF

CHKIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CHKIF and EJTTF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHKIF and EJTTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHKIF
1D Price
Change %
CHKIF100%
N/A
EJTTF - CHKIF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DLAKF - CHKIF
4%
Poorly correlated
-7.80%
DLAKY - CHKIF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
EIFZF - CHKIF
2%
Poorly correlated
+4.46%
ELALF - CHKIF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CPCAY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CPCAY and ACDVF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CPCAY and ACDVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPCAY
1D Price
Change %
CPCAY100%
+2.44%
ACDVF - CPCAY
20%
Poorly correlated
+5.87%
CPCAF - CPCAY
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EIFZF - CPCAY
9%
Poorly correlated
+4.46%
CHKIF - CPCAY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DLAKY - CPCAY
-0%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
More