CHKGF
Price
$4.43
Change
+$0.12 (+2.78%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
20.56B
CRBJY
Price
$32.80
Change
-$1.20 (-3.53%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
33.02B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHKGF vs CRBJY

Header iconCHKGF vs CRBJY Comparison
Open Charts CHKGF vs CRBJYBanner chart's image
CK Asset
Price$4.43
Change+$0.12 (+2.78%)
Volume$525
Capitalization20.56B
China Resources Land
Price$32.80
Change-$1.20 (-3.53%)
Volume$309
Capitalization33.02B
CHKGF vs CRBJY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CHKGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CRBJY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHKGF vs. CRBJY commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHKGF is a Hold and CRBJY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (CHKGF: $4.43 vs. CRBJY: $32.80)
Brand notoriety: CHKGF and CRBJY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHKGF: 91% vs. CRBJY: 50%
Market capitalization -- CHKGF: $20.56B vs. CRBJY: $33.02B
CHKGF [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $20.56B. CRBJY’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $33.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHKGF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCRBJY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CHKGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CRBJY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CRBJY is a better buy in the long-term than CHKGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHKGF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CRBJY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHKGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • CRBJY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CHKGF is a better buy in the short-term than CRBJY.

Price Growth

CHKGF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +2.95% price change this week, while CRBJY (@Real Estate Development) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +2.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.20%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+2.64% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRBJY($33B) has a higher market cap than CHKGF($20.6B). CRBJY (8.18) and CHKGF (8.12) have similar P/E ratio . CRBJY YTD gains are higher at: 18.935 vs. CHKGF (7.187). CRBJY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 58.4B vs. CHKGF (32.9B). CRBJY has higher revenues than CHKGF: CRBJY (207B) vs CHKGF (74.5B).
CHKGFCRBJYCHKGF / CRBJY
Capitalization20.6B33B62%
EBITDA32.9B58.4B56%
Gain YTD7.18718.93538%
P/E Ratio8.128.1899%
Revenue74.5B207B36%
Total Cash59.8BN/A-
Total Debt51.1BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHKGF vs CRBJY: Fundamental Ratings
CHKGF
CRBJY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10083
SMR RATING
1..100
7912
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4353
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1637
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5034

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CRBJY's Valuation (17) in the null industry is in the same range as CHKGF (23). This means that CRBJY’s stock grew similarly to CHKGF’s over the last 12 months.

CRBJY's Profit vs Risk Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as CHKGF (100). This means that CRBJY’s stock grew similarly to CHKGF’s over the last 12 months.

CRBJY's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CHKGF (79). This means that CRBJY’s stock grew significantly faster than CHKGF’s over the last 12 months.

CHKGF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as CRBJY (53). This means that CHKGF’s stock grew similarly to CRBJY’s over the last 12 months.

CHKGF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as CRBJY (37). This means that CHKGF’s stock grew similarly to CRBJY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHKGFCRBJY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHKGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CRBJY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLYW11.410.07
+0.62%
Flywire Corp
OMC71.360.14
+0.20%
Omnicom Group
RMBI13.43-0.14
-1.03%
Richmond Mutual Bancorporation
CRNC9.44-0.29
-2.98%
Cerence
CYCU0.35-0.01
-2.99%
Cycurion Inc.

CHKGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CHKGF and CDEVY have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHKGF and CDEVY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHKGF
1D Price
Change %
CHKGF100%
N/A
CDEVY - CHKGF
13%
Poorly correlated
+7.82%
CLLNY - CHKGF
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.11%
CRBJY - CHKGF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDEVF - CHKGF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CAOVY - CHKGF
3%
Poorly correlated
-8.13%
More

CRBJY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CRBJY and CAOVY have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CRBJY and CAOVY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRBJY
1D Price
Change %
CRBJY100%
N/A
CAOVY - CRBJY
24%
Poorly correlated
-8.13%
MITEY - CRBJY
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.11%
SGD - CRBJY
23%
Poorly correlated
-5.73%
MEQYF - CRBJY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SIUDF - CRBJY
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More