Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CHIQ vs KWEB
CHIQ vs KWEB Comparison
Open Charts CHIQ vs KWEB
Global X MSCI China Consumer Disc ETF
Price$21.87
Change+$0.11 (+0.51%)
Volume$12.87K
Net Assets232.88M
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
Price$37.17
Change+$0.55 (+1.50%)
Volume$15.4M
Net Assets8.12B
CHIQ vs KWEB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CHIQ vs. KWEB commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHIQ is a Hold and KWEB is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KWEB has more net assets: 8.12B vs. CHIQ (233M). KWEB has a higher annual dividend yield than CHIQ: KWEB (27.120) vs CHIQ (15.903). CHIQ was incepted earlier than KWEB: CHIQ (16 years) vs KWEB (12 years). CHIQ (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than KWEB (0.70). KWEB has a higher turnover CHIQ (32.76) vs CHIQ (32.76).
| CHIQ | KWEB | CHIQ / KWEB | |
| Gain YTD | 15.903 | 27.120 | 59% |
| Net Assets | 233M | 8.12B | 3% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.70 | 93% |
| Turnover | 32.76 | 54.00 | 61% |
| Yield | 2.34 | 2.90 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CHIQ | KWEB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 5 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 88% | 7 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CHIQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHIQ has been closely correlated with HTHT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CHIQ jumps, then HTHT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHIQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHIQ | 100% | +0.51% | ||
| HTHT - CHIQ | 72% Closely correlated | -0.45% | ||
| YUMC - CHIQ | 68% Closely correlated | -0.16% | ||
| PDD - CHIQ | 67% Closely correlated | +3.67% | ||
| VIPS - CHIQ | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.14% | ||
| NIO - CHIQ | 60% Loosely correlated | +8.09% | ||
More | ||||
KWEB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KWEB has been closely correlated with WB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KWEB jumps, then WB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KWEB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KWEB | 100% | +1.50% | ||
| WB - KWEB | 76% Closely correlated | +0.96% | ||
| BZ - KWEB | 76% Closely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| BEKE - KWEB | 75% Closely correlated | -0.33% | ||
| IQ - KWEB | 72% Closely correlated | +4.19% | ||
| YMM - KWEB | 72% Closely correlated | +2.69% | ||
More | ||||