Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CHIQ vs KWEB
CHIQ vs KWEB Comparison
Open Charts CHIQ vs KWEB
Global X MSCI China Consumer Disc ETF
Price$23.24
Change+$0.17 (+0.74%)
Volume$113
Net Assets241.72M
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
Price$39.95
Change+$0.92 (+2.36%)
Volume$114.18K
Net Assets8.65B
CHIQ vs KWEB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CHIQ vs. KWEB commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHIQ is a StrongBuy and KWEB is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KWEB has more net assets: 8.65B vs. CHIQ (242M). KWEB has a higher annual dividend yield than CHIQ: KWEB (33.516) vs CHIQ (22.263). CHIQ was incepted earlier than KWEB: CHIQ (16 years) vs KWEB (12 years). CHIQ (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than KWEB (0.70). KWEB has a higher turnover CHIQ (32.76) vs CHIQ (32.76).
| CHIQ | KWEB | CHIQ / KWEB | |
| Gain YTD | 22.263 | 33.516 | 66% |
| Net Assets | 242M | 8.65B | 3% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.70 | 93% |
| Turnover | 32.76 | 54.00 | 61% |
| Yield | 2.20 | 2.74 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CHIQ | KWEB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | about 1 month ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CHIQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHIQ has been closely correlated with PDD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CHIQ jumps, then PDD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHIQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHIQ | 100% | +1.18% | ||
| PDD - CHIQ | 74% Closely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| HTHT - CHIQ | 71% Closely correlated | +1.73% | ||
| YUMC - CHIQ | 69% Closely correlated | -1.16% | ||
| VIPS - CHIQ | 67% Closely correlated | +1.52% | ||
| NIO - CHIQ | 58% Loosely correlated | +3.70% | ||
More | ||||
KWEB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KWEB has been closely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KWEB jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KWEB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KWEB | 100% | +1.56% | ||
| BZ - KWEB | 78% Closely correlated | -0.17% | ||
| WB - KWEB | 75% Closely correlated | -1.62% | ||
| PDD - KWEB | 75% Closely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| BEKE - KWEB | 75% Closely correlated | +1.21% | ||
| ATHM - KWEB | 72% Closely correlated | -0.14% | ||
More | ||||