Advertisement
CHHQF vs CSTM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHHQF is a Hold and CSTM is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CHHQF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCSTM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CHHQF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- CSTM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CHHQF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CSTM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CHHQF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
- CSTM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CHHQF (@Aluminum) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CSTM (@Aluminum) price change was +1.93% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aluminum industry was +1.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +74.42%.
Reported Earning Dates
CSTM is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Aluminum (+1.66% weekly)Aluminum is widely used in the industries like construction, packaging and automotive sector. The segment has seen increased demand for the lightweight variety in automobiles in improving fuel efficiency. The U.S. aluminum industry generates nearly $71 billion a year in direct economic impact (according to The Aluminum Association). Arconic, Inc, Alcoa Corp and Kaiser Aluminum Corporation are major aluminum companies in the U.S.
| CHHQF | CSTM | CHHQF / CSTM | |
| Capitalization | 41.7B | 2.53B | 1,649% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 654M | - |
| Gain YTD | 119.880 | 80.428 | 149% |
| P/E Ratio | 9.52 | 22.94 | 41% |
| Revenue | N/A | 7.97B | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 122M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 2.13B | - |
CSTM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 25 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 71 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 68 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 86 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 15 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 7 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CHHQF | CSTM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 31% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 20% | 4 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 8% | 4 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 21% | 4 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 21% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 22% | 4 days ago 71% |
Advertisement
CHHQF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CHHQF and ALMMF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHHQF and ALMMF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHHQF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHHQF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ALMMF - CHHQF | 5% Poorly correlated | +10.27% | ||
| CENX - CHHQF | 4% Poorly correlated | +6.70% | ||
| KALU - CHHQF | 4% Poorly correlated | +2.91% | ||
| AA - CHHQF | 3% Poorly correlated | +5.82% | ||
| CSTM - CHHQF | 2% Poorly correlated | +2.15% | ||
More | ||||
CSTM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSTM has been loosely correlated with KALU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSTM jumps, then KALU could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CSTM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSTM | 100% | +2.15% | ||
| KALU - CSTM | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.91% | ||
| AA - CSTM | 47% Loosely correlated | +5.82% | ||
| CENX - CSTM | 36% Loosely correlated | +6.70% | ||
| NHYDY - CSTM | 30% Poorly correlated | +1.20% | ||
| NHYKF - CSTM | 25% Poorly correlated | +1.54% | ||
More | ||||