CHHGF
Price
$0.21
Change
+$0.08 (+61.54%)
Updated
Jul 16 closing price
Capitalization
133.35M
QIND
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
2.47M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHHGF vs QIND

Header iconCHHGF vs QIND Comparison
Open Charts CHHGF vs QINDBanner chart's image
Chen Hsong Holdings
Price$0.21
Change+$0.08 (+61.54%)
Volume$500
Capitalization133.35M
Quality Industrial
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$180.99K
Capitalization2.47M
CHHGF vs QIND Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CHHGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QIND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHHGF vs. QIND commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHHGF is a Hold and QIND is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (CHHGF: $0.21 vs. QIND: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: CHHGF and QIND are both not notable
Both companies represent the Industrial Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHHGF: 4% vs. QIND: 22%
Market capitalization -- CHHGF: $133.35M vs. QIND: $2.47M
CHHGF [@Industrial Machinery] is valued at $133.35M. QIND’s [@Industrial Machinery] market capitalization is $2.47M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $213.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $13.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHHGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQIND’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CHHGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • QIND’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, QIND is a better buy in the long-term than CHHGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHHGF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QIND’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHHGF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • QIND’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CHHGF is a better buy in the short-term than QIND.

Price Growth

CHHGF (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while QIND (@Industrial Machinery) price change was +1.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +1.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.45%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Machinery (+1.00% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHHGF($133M) has a higher market cap than QIND($2.47M). CHHGF has higher P/E ratio than QIND: CHHGF (6.62) vs QIND (0.21). CHHGF YTD gains are higher at: 63.889 vs. QIND (-63.833). CHHGF has more cash in the bank: 863M vs. QIND (14.4K). CHHGF has less debt than QIND: CHHGF (15.3M) vs QIND (46.2M).
CHHGFQINDCHHGF / QIND
Capitalization133M2.47M5,389%
EBITDA141MN/A-
Gain YTD63.889-63.833-100%
P/E Ratio6.620.213,141%
Revenue2.22BN/A-
Total Cash863M14.4K5,993,056%
Total Debt15.3M46.2M33%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHHGF vs QIND: Fundamental Ratings
CHHGF
QIND
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2865
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
89100
SMR RATING
1..100
868
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3639
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5198
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CHHGF's Valuation (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QIND (44). This means that CHHGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than QIND’s over the last 12 months.

CHHGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as QIND (100). This means that CHHGF’s stock grew similarly to QIND’s over the last 12 months.

QIND's SMR Rating (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CHHGF (86). This means that QIND’s stock grew significantly faster than CHHGF’s over the last 12 months.

CHHGF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as QIND (39). This means that CHHGF’s stock grew similarly to QIND’s over the last 12 months.

CHHGF's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QIND (98). This means that CHHGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than QIND’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHHGFQIND
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
5%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
4%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHHGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QIND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SSCPX7.220.02
+0.28%
Saratoga Small Capitalization I
CSXAX53.64-0.14
-0.26%
Calvert US Large Cap Core Rspnb Idx A
GMLGX35.36-0.10
-0.28%
GuideMark® Large Cap Core Service
FITIX21.86-0.11
-0.50%
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II M
MSCIX10.45-0.08
-0.76%
Madison Small Cap I

CHHGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CHHGF and QIND have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHHGF and QIND's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHHGF
1D Price
Change %
CHHGF100%
N/A
QIND - CHHGF
31%
Poorly correlated
-4.07%
GOGR - CHHGF
23%
Poorly correlated
+68.57%
DLPX - CHHGF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DMFG - CHHGF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RBC - CHHGF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.78%
More

QIND and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QIND and CHHGF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QIND and CHHGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QIND
1D Price
Change %
QIND100%
-4.07%
CHHGF - QIND
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SREMF - QIND
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.70%
HIZOF - QIND
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATLFF - QIND
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
THYKF - QIND
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More