Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CHGX vs RECS
CHGX vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CHGX vs. RECS commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHGX is a Hold and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 3.1B vs. CHGX (136M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than CHGX: RECS (7.943) vs CHGX (-30.577). CHGX was incepted earlier than RECS: CHGX (8 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than CHGX (0.49). CHGX has a higher turnover RECS (49.00) vs RECS (49.00).
| CHGX | RECS | CHGX / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | -30.577 | 7.943 | -385% |
| Net Assets | 136M | 3.1B | 4% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.15 | 327% |
| Turnover | 66.00 | 49.00 | 135% |
| Yield | 0.71 | 0.65 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CHGX | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 78% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CHGX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHGX has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CHGX jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHGX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHGX | 100% | +0.80% | ||
| CDNS - CHGX | 67% Closely correlated | +5.10% | ||
| BLK - CHGX | 66% Closely correlated | +1.08% | ||
| INTU - CHGX | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.90% | ||
| MCO - CHGX | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.60% | ||
| ADSK - CHGX | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.04% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been loosely correlated with CR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then CR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.75% | ||
| CR - RECS | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.38% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.59% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.58% | ||
| EXP - RECS | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.21% | ||
| INTU - RECS | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.90% | ||
More | ||||