CHFLF
Price
$0.52
Change
-$0.03 (-5.45%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
4.55B
PAVS
Price
$0.98
Change
+$0.06 (+6.52%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
65.99M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHFLF vs PAVS

Header iconCHFLF vs PAVS Comparison
Open Charts CHFLF vs PAVSBanner chart's image
CHINA FEIHE
Price$0.52
Change-$0.03 (-5.45%)
Volume$684
Capitalization4.55B
Paranovus Entertainment Technology
Price$0.98
Change+$0.06 (+6.52%)
Volume$528.86K
Capitalization65.99M
CHFLF vs PAVS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CHFLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAVS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHFLF vs. PAVS commentary
Sep 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHFLF is a Hold and PAVS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2025
Stock price -- (CHFLF: $0.52 vs. PAVS: $0.98)
Brand notoriety: CHFLF and PAVS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHFLF: 0% vs. PAVS: 222%
Market capitalization -- CHFLF: $4.55B vs. PAVS: $65.99M
CHFLF [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $4.55B. PAVS’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $65.99M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $231.4B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $6.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHFLF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePAVS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CHFLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PAVS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CHFLF is a better buy in the long-term than PAVS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHFLF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAVS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHFLF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • PAVS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CHFLF and PAVS are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CHFLF (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PAVS (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was +15.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +187.13%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-0.27% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHFLF($4.55B) has a higher market cap than PAVS($66M). CHFLF has higher P/E ratio than PAVS: CHFLF (12.84) vs PAVS (1.78). CHFLF YTD gains are higher at: -24.174 vs. PAVS (-28.363).
CHFLFPAVSCHFLF / PAVS
Capitalization4.55B66M6,894%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-24.174-28.36385%
P/E Ratio12.841.78720%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A2.24M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PAVS: Fundamental Ratings
PAVS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
92
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
16
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
45

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHFLFPAVS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHFLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAVS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QID21.800.15
+0.68%
ProShares UltraShort QQQ
XYZY9.50N/A
N/A
YieldMax XYZ Option Income Strategy ETF
TMFC69.98-0.16
-0.23%
Motley Fool 100 ETF
XTWY38.80-0.19
-0.50%
BondBloxx Bloomberg TwentyYrTrgDuUSTrETF
BBBL49.39-0.26
-0.51%
BondBloxx BBB Rated 10+ Yr Corp Bd ETF

CHFLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHFLF has been loosely correlated with CFEIY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHFLF jumps, then CFEIY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHFLF
1D Price
Change %
CHFLF100%
N/A
CFEIY - CHFLF
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PAVS - CHFLF
34%
Loosely correlated
+6.52%
STKH - CHFLF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.73%
RELV - CHFLF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZHYBF - CHFLF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PAVS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAVS has been loosely correlated with CHFLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PAVS jumps, then CHFLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAVS
1D Price
Change %
PAVS100%
+6.52%
CHFLF - PAVS
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NAII - PAVS
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.59%
PIFMY - PAVS
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CFEIY - PAVS
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GPDNF - PAVS
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.75%
More