It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CHFLF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileJWLLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CHFLF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JWLLF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
CHFLF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -1.55% price change this week, while JWLLF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.17%.
A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
CHFLF | JWLLF | CHFLF / JWLLF | |
Capitalization | 5.52B | 960M | 575% |
EBITDA | 8.12B | 101M | 8,038% |
Gain YTD | 1.304 | 3.074 | 42% |
P/E Ratio | 7.57 | 25.97 | 29% |
Revenue | 20.9B | 580M | 3,603% |
Total Cash | 16.5B | 16.3M | 101,227% |
Total Debt | 1.18B | 391M | 303% |
CHFLF | JWLLF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago52% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago49% | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago45% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago54% | 2 days ago31% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago49% | 2 days ago29% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago51% | 2 days ago22% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
FVC | 35.38 | 0.12 | +0.35% |
First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Foc 5 | |||
RSPU | 70.73 | 0.11 | +0.16% |
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Utilts ETF | |||
QCOC | 21.17 | 0.03 | +0.15% |
FT Vest Nasdaq-100® Cnsrv Buffr ETF -Oct | |||
IBDS | 24.25 | N/A | N/A |
iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Corp ETF | |||
TCHI | 19.74 | N/A | -0.01% |
iShares MSCI China Multisector Tech ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHFLF has been loosely correlated with CFEIY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHFLF jumps, then CFEIY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHFLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CHFLF | 100% | N/A | ||
CFEIY - CHFLF | 44% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
PAVS - CHFLF | 34% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
STKH - CHFLF | 23% Poorly correlated | -11.38% | ||
RELV - CHFLF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
ZHYBF - CHFLF | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that JWLLF and STKH have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JWLLF and STKH's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JWLLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
JWLLF | 100% | N/A | ||
STKH - JWLLF | 6% Poorly correlated | -11.38% | ||
TYCMY - JWLLF | 4% Poorly correlated | +1.13% | ||
SDSYA - JWLLF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
CHFLF - JWLLF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
RRSFF - JWLLF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |