CHFLF
Price
$0.70
Change
-$0.01 (-1.41%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
5.52B
JWLLF
Price
$27.16
Change
+$1.44 (+5.60%)
Updated
Jun 16 closing price
Capitalization
960.04M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHFLF vs JWLLF

Header iconCHFLF vs JWLLF Comparison
Open Charts CHFLF vs JWLLFBanner chart's image
CHINA FEIHE
Price$0.70
Change-$0.01 (-1.41%)
Volume$41.67K
Capitalization5.52B
Jamieson Wellness
Price$27.16
Change+$1.44 (+5.60%)
Volume$100
Capitalization960.04M
CHFLF vs JWLLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CHFLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JWLLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHFLF vs. JWLLF commentary
Jun 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHFLF is a Hold and JWLLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 28, 2025
Stock price -- (CHFLF: $0.70 vs. JWLLF: $27.16)
Brand notoriety: CHFLF and JWLLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHFLF: 71% vs. JWLLF: 92%
Market capitalization -- CHFLF: $5.52B vs. JWLLF: $960.04M
CHFLF [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $5.52B. JWLLF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $960.04M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHFLF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileJWLLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CHFLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • JWLLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CHFLF and JWLLF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHFLF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JWLLF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHFLF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • JWLLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, JWLLF is a better buy in the short-term than CHFLF.

Price Growth

CHFLF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -1.55% price change this week, while JWLLF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.17%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.38% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHFLF($5.52B) has a higher market cap than JWLLF($960M). JWLLF has higher P/E ratio than CHFLF: JWLLF (25.97) vs CHFLF (7.57). JWLLF YTD gains are higher at: 3.074 vs. CHFLF (1.304). CHFLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.12B vs. JWLLF (101M). CHFLF has more cash in the bank: 16.5B vs. JWLLF (16.3M). JWLLF has less debt than CHFLF: JWLLF (391M) vs CHFLF (1.18B). CHFLF has higher revenues than JWLLF: CHFLF (20.9B) vs JWLLF (580M).
CHFLFJWLLFCHFLF / JWLLF
Capitalization5.52B960M575%
EBITDA8.12B101M8,038%
Gain YTD1.3043.07442%
P/E Ratio7.5725.9729%
Revenue20.9B580M3,603%
Total Cash16.5B16.3M101,227%
Total Debt1.18B391M303%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHFLFJWLLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHFLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JWLLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FVC35.380.12
+0.35%
First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Foc 5
RSPU70.730.11
+0.16%
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Utilts ETF
QCOC21.170.03
+0.15%
FT Vest Nasdaq-100® Cnsrv Buffr ETF -Oct
IBDS24.25N/A
N/A
iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Corp ETF
TCHI19.74N/A
-0.01%
iShares MSCI China Multisector Tech ETF

CHFLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHFLF has been loosely correlated with CFEIY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHFLF jumps, then CFEIY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHFLF
1D Price
Change %
CHFLF100%
N/A
CFEIY - CHFLF
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PAVS - CHFLF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
STKH - CHFLF
23%
Poorly correlated
-11.38%
RELV - CHFLF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZHYBF - CHFLF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

JWLLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JWLLF and STKH have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JWLLF and STKH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JWLLF
1D Price
Change %
JWLLF100%
N/A
STKH - JWLLF
6%
Poorly correlated
-11.38%
TYCMY - JWLLF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
SDSYA - JWLLF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHFLF - JWLLF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RRSFF - JWLLF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More