CHFFY
Price
$6.76
Change
+$1.36 (+25.19%)
Updated
Nov 18 closing price
Capitalization
3.8B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GFL
Price
$43.68
Change
+$1.32 (+3.12%)
Updated
Jan 21, 10:57 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
15.24B
34 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHFFY vs GFL

Header iconCHFFY vs GFL Comparison
Open Charts CHFFY vs GFLBanner chart's image
China Everbright Environment Group
Price$6.76
Change+$1.36 (+25.19%)
Volume$765
Capitalization3.8B
GFL Environmental
Price$43.68
Change+$1.32 (+3.12%)
Volume$1.55K
Capitalization15.24B
CHFFY vs GFL Comparison Chart in %
CHFFY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GFL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHFFY vs. GFL commentary
Jan 21, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHFFY is a Hold and GFL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 21, 2026
Stock price -- (CHFFY: $6.76 vs. GFL: $42.36)
Brand notoriety: CHFFY and GFL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHFFY: 96% vs. GFL: 79%
Market capitalization -- CHFFY: $3.8B vs. GFL: $15.24B
CHFFY [@Environmental Services] is valued at $3.8B. GFL’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $15.24B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $89.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.33B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHFFY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGFL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CHFFY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GFL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CHFFY is a better buy in the long-term than GFL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHFFY’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GFL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHFFY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • GFL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GFL is a better buy in the short-term than CHFFY.

Price Growth

CHFFY (@Environmental Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GFL (@Environmental Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was -0.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

GFL is expected to report earnings on Feb 24, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (-0.67% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFL($15.2B) has a higher market cap than CHFFY($3.8B). GFL has higher P/E ratio than CHFFY: GFL (244.90) vs CHFFY (10.35). CHFFY YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. GFL (-1.338). CHFFY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.36B vs. GFL (1.89B). CHFFY has higher revenues than GFL: CHFFY (28.9B) vs GFL (8.22B).
CHFFYGFLCHFFY / GFL
Capitalization3.8B15.2B25%
EBITDA7.36B1.89B390%
Gain YTD0.000-1.338-
P/E Ratio10.35244.904%
Revenue28.9B8.22B351%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHFFY vs GFL: Fundamental Ratings
CHFFY
GFL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4673
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4250
SMR RATING
1..100
10019
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3961
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
11100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CHFFY's Valuation (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GFL (95). This means that CHFFY’s stock grew significantly faster than GFL’s over the last 12 months.

CHFFY's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as GFL (50). This means that CHFFY’s stock grew similarly to GFL’s over the last 12 months.

GFL's SMR Rating (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CHFFY (100). This means that GFL’s stock grew significantly faster than CHFFY’s over the last 12 months.

CHFFY's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as GFL (61). This means that CHFFY’s stock grew similarly to GFL’s over the last 12 months.

CHFFY's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GFL (100). This means that CHFFY’s stock grew significantly faster than GFL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHFFYGFL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHFFY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GFL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SDCI23.160.29
+1.27%
USCF SummerHaven Dyn CmdtyStgy NoK-1 ETF
IBTI22.34N/A
N/A
iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Treasury ETF
DVXB26.96N/A
N/A
WEBs Materials XLB Defined Vol ETF
HFEQ21.66-0.22
-0.99%
Unlimited HFEQ Equity Long/Short ETF
KTEC16.02-0.39
-2.38%
KraneShares Hang Seng TECH ETF

CHFFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CHFFY and TSPCF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHFFY and TSPCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHFFY
1D Price
Change %
CHFFY100%
N/A
TSPCF - CHFFY
23%
Poorly correlated
-3.64%
CWSFF - CHFFY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VEOEF - CHFFY
10%
Poorly correlated
-5.57%
BTQNF - CHFFY
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GFL - CHFFY
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.49%
More

GFL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFL has been loosely correlated with WCN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GFL jumps, then WCN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFL
1D Price
Change %
GFL100%
-0.49%
WCN - GFL
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.71%
RSG - GFL
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.16%
CWST - GFL
54%
Loosely correlated
-2.23%
WM - GFL
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
CLH - GFL
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.94%
More