CHFFY
Price
$5.40
Change
+$0.10 (+1.89%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
3.58B
GFL
Price
$47.90
Change
-$0.34 (-0.70%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
17.4B
52 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHFFY vs GFL

Header iconCHFFY vs GFL Comparison
Open Charts CHFFY vs GFLBanner chart's image
China Everbright Environment Group
Price$5.40
Change+$0.10 (+1.89%)
Volume$2.1K
Capitalization3.58B
GFL Environmental
Price$47.90
Change-$0.34 (-0.70%)
Volume$1.86M
Capitalization17.4B
CHFFY vs GFL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CHFFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHFFY vs. GFL commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHFFY is a Hold and GFL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CHFFY: $5.40 vs. GFL: $47.90)
Brand notoriety: CHFFY and GFL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHFFY: 380% vs. GFL: 159%
Market capitalization -- CHFFY: $3.58B vs. GFL: $17.4B
CHFFY [@Environmental Services] is valued at $3.58B. GFL’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $17.4B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $88.65B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.07B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHFFY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGFL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CHFFY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GFL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CHFFY and GFL are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHFFY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GFL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHFFY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GFL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GFL is a better buy in the short-term than CHFFY.

Price Growth

CHFFY (@Environmental Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GFL (@Environmental Services) price change was -4.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +0.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.61%.

Reported Earning Dates

GFL is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (+0.77% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFL($17.4B) has a higher market cap than CHFFY($3.58B). GFL has higher P/E ratio than CHFFY: GFL (1651.88) vs CHFFY (8.27). CHFFY YTD gains are higher at: 34.214 vs. GFL (7.647).
CHFFYGFLCHFFY / GFL
Capitalization3.58B17.4B21%
EBITDAN/A1.9B-
Gain YTD34.2147.647447%
P/E Ratio8.271651.881%
RevenueN/A8.08B-
Total CashN/A140M-
Total DebtN/A7.21B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHFFY: Fundamental Ratings
CHFFY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
62
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
13
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHFFYGFL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHFFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BITO19.240.30
+1.58%
ProShares Bitcoin ETF
CATF49.120.35
+0.71%
American Century California Municipal Bond ETF
EJAN32.810.13
+0.39%
Innovator Emerging Mkt Pwr Buff ETF™ Jan
BALI31.03-0.08
-0.26%
iShares Advantage Large Cap Income ETF
GGLS9.25-0.10
-1.07%
Direxion Daily GOOGL Bear 1X ETF

CHFFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CHFFY and BTQNF have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHFFY and BTQNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHFFY
1D Price
Change %
CHFFY100%
N/A
BTQNF - CHFFY
16%
Poorly correlated
-0.65%
CHFFF - CHFFY
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AQMS - CHFFY
9%
Poorly correlated
+8.59%
GFL - CHFFY
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.70%
CWSFF - CHFFY
4%
Poorly correlated
-25.97%
More

GFL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFL has been loosely correlated with WCN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GFL jumps, then WCN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFL
1D Price
Change %
GFL100%
-0.70%
WCN - GFL
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.09%
CWST - GFL
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.93%
WM - GFL
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.17%
RSG - GFL
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.76%
CLH - GFL
38%
Loosely correlated
-3.62%
More