CHEOY
Price
$98.00
Change
+$0.37 (+0.38%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
12.74B
CSBTF
Price
$32.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
1.21B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHEOY vs CSBTF

Header iconCHEOY vs CSBTF Comparison
Open Charts CHEOY vs CSBTFBanner chart's image
CochLear
Price$98.00
Change+$0.37 (+0.38%)
Volume$6.74K
Capitalization12.74B
Kuros Bioscience
Price$32.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$850
Capitalization1.21B
CHEOY vs CSBTF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CHEOY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CSBTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHEOY vs. CSBTF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHEOY is a Buy and CSBTF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CHEOY: $98.00 vs. CSBTF: $32.00)
Brand notoriety: CHEOY and CSBTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical/Nursing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHEOY: 237% vs. CSBTF: 184%
Market capitalization -- CHEOY: $12.74B vs. CSBTF: $1.21B
CHEOY [@Medical/Nursing Services] is valued at $12.74B. CSBTF’s [@Medical/Nursing Services] market capitalization is $1.21B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $231.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $5.63B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHEOY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCSBTF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CHEOY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CSBTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CHEOY is a better buy in the long-term than CSBTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHEOY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CSBTF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHEOY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CSBTF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CHEOY is a better buy in the short-term than CSBTF.

Price Growth

CHEOY (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -0.01% price change this week, while CSBTF (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.78%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical/Nursing Services (-0.21% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHEOY($12.7B) has a higher market cap than CSBTF($1.21B). CSBTF YTD gains are higher at: 41.781 vs. CHEOY (11.155). CHEOY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 620M vs. CSBTF (-561K). CHEOY has more cash in the bank: 276M vs. CSBTF (17.5M). CSBTF has less debt than CHEOY: CSBTF (1.79M) vs CHEOY (236M). CHEOY has higher revenues than CSBTF: CHEOY (2.34B) vs CSBTF (75.6M).
CHEOYCSBTFCHEOY / CSBTF
Capitalization12.7B1.21B1,050%
EBITDA620M-561K-110,517%
Gain YTD11.15541.78127%
P/E Ratio50.60N/A-
Revenue2.34B75.6M3,099%
Total Cash276M17.5M1,577%
Total Debt236M1.79M13,162%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHEOY vs CSBTF: Fundamental Ratings
CHEOY
CSBTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2625
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4624
SMR RATING
1..100
4495
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5346
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
59100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CHEOY's Valuation (44) in the null industry is in the same range as CSBTF (50). This means that CHEOY’s stock grew similarly to CSBTF’s over the last 12 months.

CSBTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the null industry is in the same range as CHEOY (46). This means that CSBTF’s stock grew similarly to CHEOY’s over the last 12 months.

CHEOY's SMR Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSBTF (95). This means that CHEOY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSBTF’s over the last 12 months.

CSBTF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as CHEOY (53). This means that CSBTF’s stock grew similarly to CHEOY’s over the last 12 months.

CHEOY's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSBTF (100). This means that CHEOY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSBTF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHEOYCSBTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHEOY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CSBTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VAFIX34.460.41
+1.20%
Invesco American Franchise Y
FIDAX19.420.22
+1.15%
JHancock Financial Industries A
TWIEX13.780.09
+0.66%
American Century International Gr Inv
FHJMX44.44N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Europe I
KGLAX17.08-0.03
-0.18%
Kinetics Global Adv A

CHEOY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CHEOY and TWST have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHEOY and TWST's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHEOY
1D Price
Change %
CHEOY100%
+0.38%
TWST - CHEOY
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.42%
SKHHY - CHEOY
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
BLFS - CHEOY
26%
Poorly correlated
+3.31%
TMO - CHEOY
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.02%
ESTA - CHEOY
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.78%
More

CSBTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSBTF has been loosely correlated with VVOS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSBTF jumps, then VVOS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSBTF
1D Price
Change %
CSBTF100%
N/A
VVOS - CSBTF
51%
Loosely correlated
-2.87%
INBS - CSBTF
23%
Poorly correlated
-3.80%
BIOQ - CSBTF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DSRLF - CSBTF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHEOY - CSBTF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
More