Advertisement
CHE vs UHS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHE is a Hold and UHS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CHE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUHS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CHE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- UHS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CHE’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UHS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CHE’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- UHS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CHE (@Hospital/Nursing Management) experienced а +2.45% price change this week, while UHS (@Hospital/Nursing Management) price change was +4.31% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hospital/Nursing Management industry was +1.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.17%.
Reported Earning Dates
CHE is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.
UHS is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Hospital/Nursing Management (+1.47% weekly)Hospital/Nursing Management companies own and operate health care facilities. Their operations include nursing homes, acute care facilities, retirement centers and outpatient surgery centers. HCA Healthcare Inc., Alcon Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. are some major companies in this industry. Technology has been at the forefront of development of advanced solutions, including quicker diagnoses of complex conditions. Investments in new diagnostics, healthcare IoT, and other healthcare technologies continue to gather momentum in this industry.
| CHE | UHS | CHE / UHS | |
| Capitalization | 6.42B | 13B | 49% |
| EBITDA | 453M | 2.43B | 19% |
| Gain YTD | -16.580 | 14.388 | -115% |
| P/E Ratio | 22.67 | 10.78 | 210% |
| Revenue | 2.51B | 16.5B | 15% |
| Total Cash | 250M | 138M | 181% |
| Total Debt | 146M | 5.01B | 3% |
CHE | UHS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 60 Fair valued | 21 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 39 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 39 | 47 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 82 | 75 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
UHS's Valuation (21) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHE (60) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that UHS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHE’s over the last 12 months.
UHS's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHE (100) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that UHS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHE’s over the last 12 months.
CHE's SMR Rating (39) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as UHS (47) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry. This means that CHE’s stock grew similarly to UHS’s over the last 12 months.
UHS's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHE (79) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that UHS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHE’s over the last 12 months.
UHS's P/E Growth Rating (75) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is in the same range as CHE (82) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that UHS’s stock grew similarly to CHE’s over the last 12 months.
| CHE | UHS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 53% | 4 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 51% | 4 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 56% | 4 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 50% | 4 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 46% | 4 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 48% | 6 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 49% | 11 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 49% | 4 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 39% | 4 days ago 60% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BLCV | 35.48 | 0.23 | +0.65% |
| iShares Large Cap Value Active ETF | |||
| BOCT | 48.29 | 0.25 | +0.52% |
| Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF™ Oct | |||
| EQTY | 25.89 | 0.11 | +0.43% |
| Kovitz Core Equity ETF | |||
| SCDV | 24.85 | 0.03 | +0.10% |
| Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF | |||
| ZSB | 18.17 | -0.08 | -0.46% |
| USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Stgy Fd | |||
CHE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHE has been loosely correlated with OPCH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHE jumps, then OPCH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHE | 100% | +2.24% | ||
| OPCH - CHE | 44% Loosely correlated | +2.47% | ||
| DVA - CHE | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| UHS - CHE | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.16% | ||
| NHC - CHE | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.06% | ||
| LTGHF - CHE | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
UHS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UHS has been closely correlated with HCA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UHS jumps, then HCA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UHS | 100% | +0.16% | ||
| HCA - UHS | 81% Closely correlated | +1.56% | ||
| THC - UHS | 70% Closely correlated | +0.44% | ||
| ARDT - UHS | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.27% | ||
| CYH - UHS | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| ENSG - UHS | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.43% | ||
More | ||||