Advertisement
CHE vs FMS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHE is a Hold and FMS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CHE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFMS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CHE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- FMS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CHE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FMS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CHE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- FMS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CHE (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -1.87% price change this week, while FMS (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -1.81% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -2.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.17%.
Reported Earning Dates
CHE is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.
FMS is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical/Nursing Services (-2.28% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
| CHE | FMS | CHE / FMS | |
| Capitalization | 9.7B | 11.2B | 87% |
| EBITDA | 414M | 3.21B | 13% |
| Gain YTD | -14.664 | 20.505 | -72% |
| P/E Ratio | 35.73 | 20.80 | 172% |
| Revenue | 2.26B | 19.5B | 12% |
| Total Cash | 264M | 1.54B | 17% |
| Total Debt | 155M | 12.1B | 1% |
CHE | FMS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | 10 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 97 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 37 | 84 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | 55 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FMS's Valuation (10) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for CHE (83). This means that FMS’s stock grew significantly faster than CHE’s over the last 12 months.
CHE's Profit vs Risk Rating (97) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as FMS (100). This means that CHE’s stock grew similarly to FMS’s over the last 12 months.
CHE's SMR Rating (37) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FMS (84). This means that CHE’s stock grew somewhat faster than FMS’s over the last 12 months.
FMS's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHE (88). This means that FMS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHE’s over the last 12 months.
FMS's P/E Growth Rating (55) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as CHE (80). This means that FMS’s stock grew similarly to CHE’s over the last 12 months.
| CHE | FMS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 54% | 4 days ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 49% | 4 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 55% | 4 days ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 49% | 4 days ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 44% | 4 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 48% | 22 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 48% | 4 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 55% | 4 days ago 44% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 32% | 4 days ago 73% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| HYDW | 47.20 | 0.26 | +0.55% |
| Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF | |||
| SCUS | 25.15 | 0.01 | +0.04% |
| Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF | |||
| CPII | 19.39 | N/A | N/A |
| American Beacon Ionic Inflation Prot ETF | |||
| DFNM | 47.28 | -0.01 | -0.02% |
| Dimensional National Municipal Bond ETF | |||
| SPYC | 40.86 | -0.31 | -0.76% |
| Simplify US Equity PLUS Convexity ETF | |||
CHE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHE has been loosely correlated with OPCH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHE jumps, then OPCH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHE | 100% | -1.35% | ||
| OPCH - CHE | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.54% | ||
| DVA - CHE | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.55% | ||
| ADUS - CHE | 35% Loosely correlated | -2.43% | ||
| NHC - CHE | 29% Poorly correlated | -1.30% | ||
| ENSG - CHE | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.48% | ||
More | ||||
FMS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMS has been loosely correlated with DVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FMS jumps, then DVA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FMS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMS | 100% | -1.63% | ||
| DVA - FMS | 38% Loosely correlated | -1.55% | ||
| OPCH - FMS | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.54% | ||
| ADUS - FMS | 25% Poorly correlated | -2.43% | ||
| CHE - FMS | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.35% | ||
| USPH - FMS | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.37% | ||
More | ||||