CHDRF
Price
$558.13
Change
-$16.87 (-2.93%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
100.42B
SWGNF
Price
$37.44
Change
+$0.17 (+0.46%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
9.59B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHDRF vs SWGNF

Header iconCHDRF vs SWGNF Comparison
Open Charts CHDRF vs SWGNFBanner chart's image
Christian Dior S.E
Price$558.13
Change-$16.87 (-2.93%)
Volume$117
Capitalization100.42B
Swatch Group AG
Price$37.44
Change+$0.17 (+0.46%)
Volume$186
Capitalization9.59B
CHDRF vs SWGNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CHDRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SWGNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHDRF vs. SWGNF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHDRF is a Buy and SWGNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CHDRF: $558.13 vs. SWGNF: $37.44)
Brand notoriety: CHDRF and SWGNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Catalog/Specialty Distribution industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHDRF: 783% vs. SWGNF: 32%
Market capitalization -- CHDRF: $100.42B vs. SWGNF: $9.59B
CHDRF [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] is valued at $100.42B. SWGNF’s [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] market capitalization is $9.59B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] industry ranges from $289.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] industry is $38.51B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHDRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSWGNF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CHDRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SWGNF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CHDRF and SWGNF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHDRF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SWGNF’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHDRF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SWGNF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SWGNF is a better buy in the short-term than CHDRF.

Price Growth

CHDRF (@Catalog/Specialty Distribution) experienced а -2.93% price change this week, while SWGNF (@Catalog/Specialty Distribution) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Catalog/Specialty Distribution industry was +1.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.96%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Catalog/Specialty Distribution (+1.77% weekly)

The catalog and specialty distribution industry includes companies that offer retail through mail-order houses, media, online social platforms, mobile apps and other channels outside of brick-and-mortar stores. Several companies in this business partner with retail companies to assist them with marketing, digital solutions, warehousing, and/or other distribution capabilities. In essence, the industry acts as a potential catalyst for retailers/brands to widen their reach among customers. Pinduoduo Inc., Qurate Retail, Inc. and Baozun are some of the major players in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHDRF($100B) has a higher market cap than SWGNF($9.59B). SWGNF has higher P/E ratio than CHDRF: SWGNF (127.54) vs CHDRF (18.96). SWGNF YTD gains are higher at: 6.788 vs. CHDRF (-9.099). CHDRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 25.5B vs. SWGNF (617M). CHDRF has more cash in the bank: 12.5B vs. SWGNF (1.28B). SWGNF has less debt than CHDRF: SWGNF (187M) vs CHDRF (49.6B). CHDRF has higher revenues than SWGNF: CHDRF (82.8B) vs SWGNF (6.35B).
CHDRFSWGNFCHDRF / SWGNF
Capitalization100B9.59B1,043%
EBITDA25.5B617M4,133%
Gain YTD-9.0996.788-134%
P/E Ratio18.96127.5415%
Revenue82.8B6.35B1,304%
Total Cash12.5B1.28B980%
Total Debt49.6B187M26,524%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHDRF vs SWGNF: Fundamental Ratings
CHDRF
SWGNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2288
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
81100
SMR RATING
1..100
9992
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5160
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
502
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CHDRF's Valuation (17) in the null industry is in the same range as SWGNF (31). This means that CHDRF’s stock grew similarly to SWGNF’s over the last 12 months.

CHDRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as SWGNF (100). This means that CHDRF’s stock grew similarly to SWGNF’s over the last 12 months.

SWGNF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as CHDRF (99). This means that SWGNF’s stock grew similarly to CHDRF’s over the last 12 months.

CHDRF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as SWGNF (60). This means that CHDRF’s stock grew similarly to SWGNF’s over the last 12 months.

SWGNF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHDRF (50). This means that SWGNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHDRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHDRFSWGNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
19%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
35%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
34%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
33%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHDRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SWGNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTCW118.261.96
+1.69%
WisdomTree Bitcoin Fund
NIXT26.520.25
+0.95%
Research Affiliates Deletions ETF
EMB94.760.63
+0.67%
iShares JP Morgan USD Em Mkts Bd ETF
ITDF35.740.04
+0.11%
iShares LifePath Target Date 2050 ETF
AUSF46.300.03
+0.06%
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF

CHDRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHDRF has been loosely correlated with LVMUY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHDRF jumps, then LVMUY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHDRF
1D Price
Change %
CHDRF100%
-2.93%
LVMUY - CHDRF
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.39%
LVMHF - CHDRF
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
SWGAY - CHDRF
36%
Loosely correlated
+3.24%
HESAY - CHDRF
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.48%
PPRUY - CHDRF
32%
Poorly correlated
+2.28%
More

SWGNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SWGNF and LKFLF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SWGNF and LKFLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SWGNF
1D Price
Change %
SWGNF100%
N/A
LKFLF - SWGNF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SWGAY - SWGNF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.24%
PPRUY - SWGNF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.28%
CHDRF - SWGNF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.93%
WOSGF - SWGNF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More