CHDRF
Price
$502.87
Change
-$26.72 (-5.05%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
94.4B
LVMUY
Price
$107.77
Change
+$0.47 (+0.44%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
267.71B
59 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHDRF vs LVMUY

Header iconCHDRF vs LVMUY Comparison
Open Charts CHDRF vs LVMUYBanner chart's image
Christian Dior S.E
Price$502.87
Change-$26.72 (-5.05%)
Volume$44
Capitalization94.4B
LVMH-Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton
Price$107.77
Change+$0.47 (+0.44%)
Volume$180.58K
Capitalization267.71B
CHDRF vs LVMUY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CHDRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LVMUY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHDRF vs. LVMUY commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHDRF is a Hold and LVMUY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (CHDRF: $502.87 vs. LVMUY: $107.77)
Brand notoriety: CHDRF and LVMUY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Catalog/Specialty Distribution industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHDRF: 257% vs. LVMUY: 35%
Market capitalization -- CHDRF: $94.4B vs. LVMUY: $267.71B
CHDRF [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] is valued at $94.4B. LVMUY’s [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] market capitalization is $267.71B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] industry ranges from $267.71B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] industry is $37.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHDRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLVMUY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CHDRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LVMUY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CHDRF is a better buy in the long-term than LVMUY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHDRF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LVMUY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHDRF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LVMUY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CHDRF is a better buy in the short-term than LVMUY.

Price Growth

CHDRF (@Catalog/Specialty Distribution) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LVMUY (@Catalog/Specialty Distribution) price change was +1.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Catalog/Specialty Distribution industry was +0.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

LVMUY is expected to report earnings on Oct 09, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Catalog/Specialty Distribution (+0.15% weekly)

The catalog and specialty distribution industry includes companies that offer retail through mail-order houses, media, online social platforms, mobile apps and other channels outside of brick-and-mortar stores. Several companies in this business partner with retail companies to assist them with marketing, digital solutions, warehousing, and/or other distribution capabilities. In essence, the industry acts as a potential catalyst for retailers/brands to widen their reach among customers. Pinduoduo Inc., Qurate Retail, Inc. and Baozun are some of the major players in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LVMUY($268B) has a higher market cap than CHDRF($94.4B). LVMUY has higher P/E ratio than CHDRF: LVMUY (21.00) vs CHDRF (17.08). LVMUY YTD gains are higher at: -15.003 vs. CHDRF (-18.099). CHDRF (25.5B) and LVMUY (25.5B) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . CHDRF (12.5B) and LVMUY (12.3B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . LVMUY has less debt than CHDRF: LVMUY (39.6B) vs CHDRF (49.6B). CHDRF (82.8B) and LVMUY (82.8B) have equivalent revenues.
CHDRFLVMUYCHDRF / LVMUY
Capitalization94.4B268B35%
EBITDA25.5B25.5B100%
Gain YTD-18.099-15.003121%
P/E Ratio17.0821.0081%
Revenue82.8B82.8B100%
Total Cash12.5B12.3B102%
Total Debt49.6B39.6B125%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHDRF vs LVMUY: Fundamental Ratings
CHDRF
LVMUY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5053
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8476
SMR RATING
1..100
9998
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7879
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5361
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6524

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CHDRF's Valuation (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LVMUY (78). This means that CHDRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LVMUY’s over the last 12 months.

LVMUY's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as CHDRF (84). This means that LVMUY’s stock grew similarly to CHDRF’s over the last 12 months.

LVMUY's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as CHDRF (99). This means that LVMUY’s stock grew similarly to CHDRF’s over the last 12 months.

CHDRF's Price Growth Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as LVMUY (79). This means that CHDRF’s stock grew similarly to LVMUY’s over the last 12 months.

CHDRF's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as LVMUY (61). This means that CHDRF’s stock grew similarly to LVMUY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHDRFLVMUY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHDRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LVMUY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GILD119.419.13
+8.28%
Gilead Sciences
PLAB20.210.43
+2.17%
Photronics
ZUMZ14.71N/A
N/A
Zumiez
SITE132.30-1.63
-1.22%
SiteOne Landscape Supply
MCVT5.99-0.18
-2.92%
Mill City Ventures III Ltd

CHDRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHDRF has been loosely correlated with LVMUY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHDRF jumps, then LVMUY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHDRF
1D Price
Change %
CHDRF100%
N/A
LVMUY - CHDRF
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
LVMHF - CHDRF
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.54%
SWGAY - CHDRF
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
HESAY - CHDRF
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.16%
PPRUY - CHDRF
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.33%
More

LVMUY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LVMUY has been closely correlated with LVMHF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 97% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LVMUY jumps, then LVMHF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LVMUY
1D Price
Change %
LVMUY100%
+0.44%
LVMHF - LVMUY
97%
Closely correlated
+0.54%
HESAY - LVMUY
83%
Closely correlated
-0.16%
HESAF - LVMUY
74%
Closely correlated
-2.21%
PPRUY - LVMUY
68%
Closely correlated
+1.33%
SWGAY - LVMUY
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
More